Stat	vs. Current Card	vs. All Horses
Averages Career-average metrics across all AI race analysis. Performance and pace averages reflect estimated historical performance; trainer and jockey grades score in-the-money percentages. Grading scale: A = elite • B = above average • C = average • D = below average • F = poor • — = no data
Pick Pony AI Rating	B	B
Speed	C	D
Early Pace	F	D
Mid Pace	F	C
Late Pace	A	D
Finish Pos	A	B
Dirt Speed	A	B
Turf Speed	C	D
Distance Speed	F	F
Trainer Effectiveness	A	A
Jockey Effectiveness	B	A
3rd Party Ratings	B	B
Recent Performance analysis from the horse's recent races, weighted to reflect current form. Sprint and Route FPS (Foot Per Second) measure pace efficiency over the horse's recent sprints and routes respectively. Grading scale: A = elite • B = above average • C = average • D = below average • F = poor • — = no data
Speed	A	A
Early Pace	A	A
Mid Pace	A	A
Late Pace	A	A
Sprint FPS	A	A
Route FPS	B	A
Trainer Effectiveness	A	A
Jockey Effectiveness	B	A
3rd Party Ratings	B	B
Predictions AI-generated projections for the upcoming race, derived from prior AI analysis for speed and pace trends, surface and distance suitability, and current conditions. Grading scale: A = elite • B = above average • C = average • D = below average • F = poor • — = no data
Speed	C	D
Early Pace	B	B
Mid Pace	B	C
Late Pace	C	C

Stat	vs. Current Card	vs. All Horses
Averages Career-average metrics across all AI race analysis. Performance and pace averages reflect estimated historical performance; trainer and jockey grades score in-the-money percentages. Grading scale: A = elite • B = above average • C = average • D = below average • F = poor • — = no data
Pick Pony AI Rating	A	A
Speed	A	D
Early Pace	A	A
Mid Pace	C	B
Late Pace	B	D
Finish Pos	B	C
Dirt Speed	B	C
Turf Speed	C	D
Distance Speed	A	C
Trainer Effectiveness	F	F
Jockey Effectiveness	C	C
3rd Party Ratings	B	B
Recent Performance analysis from the horse's recent races, weighted to reflect current form. Sprint and Route FPS (Foot Per Second) measure pace efficiency over the horse's recent sprints and routes respectively. Grading scale: A = elite • B = above average • C = average • D = below average • F = poor • — = no data
Speed	B	B
Early Pace	B	A
Mid Pace	B	A
Late Pace	B	B
Sprint FPS	B	A
Route FPS	A	A
Trainer Effectiveness	F	F
Jockey Effectiveness	C	C
3rd Party Ratings	B	B
Predictions AI-generated projections for the upcoming race, derived from prior AI analysis for speed and pace trends, surface and distance suitability, and current conditions. Grading scale: A = elite • B = above average • C = average • D = below average • F = poor • — = no data
Speed	A	D
Early Pace	A	A
Mid Pace	A	A
Late Pace	C	C

Stat	vs. Current Card	vs. All Horses
Averages Career-average metrics across all AI race analysis. Performance and pace averages reflect estimated historical performance; trainer and jockey grades score in-the-money percentages. Grading scale: A = elite • B = above average • C = average • D = below average • F = poor • — = no data
Pick Pony AI Rating	A	A
Speed	B	D
Early Pace	B	A
Mid Pace	B	B
Late Pace	F	F
Finish Pos	C	D
Dirt Speed	B	C
Turf Speed	A	B
Distance Speed	B	C
Trainer Effectiveness	B	A
Jockey Effectiveness	A	A
3rd Party Ratings	A	A
Recent Performance analysis from the horse's recent races, weighted to reflect current form. Sprint and Route FPS (Foot Per Second) measure pace efficiency over the horse's recent sprints and routes respectively. Grading scale: A = elite • B = above average • C = average • D = below average • F = poor • — = no data
Speed	B	C
Early Pace	A	A
Mid Pace	A	A
Late Pace	C	D
Sprint FPS	B	A
Route FPS	B	A
Trainer Effectiveness	B	A
Jockey Effectiveness	A	A
3rd Party Ratings	A	A
Predictions AI-generated projections for the upcoming race, derived from prior AI analysis for speed and pace trends, surface and distance suitability, and current conditions. Grading scale: A = elite • B = above average • C = average • D = below average • F = poor • — = no data
Speed	B	D
Early Pace	A	A
Mid Pace	B	B
Late Pace	C	C

Stat	vs. Current Card	vs. All Horses
Averages Career-average metrics across all AI race analysis. Performance and pace averages reflect estimated historical performance; trainer and jockey grades score in-the-money percentages. Grading scale: A = elite • B = above average • C = average • D = below average • F = poor • — = no data
Pick Pony AI Rating	B	B
Speed	A	C
Early Pace	D	B
Mid Pace	A	B
Late Pace	A	B
Finish Pos	C	C
Dirt Speed	B	C
Turf Speed	C	D
Distance Speed	A	B
Trainer Effectiveness	B	A
Jockey Effectiveness	A	A
3rd Party Ratings	A	B
Recent Performance analysis from the horse's recent races, weighted to reflect current form. Sprint and Route FPS (Foot Per Second) measure pace efficiency over the horse's recent sprints and routes respectively. Grading scale: A = elite • B = above average • C = average • D = below average • F = poor • — = no data
Speed	A	B
Early Pace	C	B
Mid Pace	C	B
Late Pace	A	B
Sprint FPS	C	B
Route FPS	C	A
Trainer Effectiveness	B	A
Jockey Effectiveness	A	A
3rd Party Ratings	A	B
Predictions AI-generated projections for the upcoming race, derived from prior AI analysis for speed and pace trends, surface and distance suitability, and current conditions. Grading scale: A = elite • B = above average • C = average • D = below average • F = poor • — = no data
Speed	A	C
Early Pace	D	C
Mid Pace	C	C
Late Pace	C	C

Stat	vs. Current Card	vs. All Horses
Averages Career-average metrics across all AI race analysis. Performance and pace averages reflect estimated historical performance; trainer and jockey grades score in-the-money percentages. Grading scale: A = elite • B = above average • C = average • D = below average • F = poor • — = no data
Pick Pony AI Rating	D	C
Speed	D	C
Early Pace	F	C
Mid Pace	F	C
Late Pace	B	C
Finish Pos	D	F
Dirt Speed	A	A
Turf Speed	D	D
Distance Speed	A	A
Trainer Effectiveness	B	A
Jockey Effectiveness	C	C
3rd Party Ratings	D	C
Recent Performance analysis from the horse's recent races, weighted to reflect current form. Sprint and Route FPS (Foot Per Second) measure pace efficiency over the horse's recent sprints and routes respectively. Grading scale: A = elite • B = above average • C = average • D = below average • F = poor • — = no data
Speed	D	F
Early Pace	F	F
Mid Pace	F	D
Late Pace	D	D
Sprint FPS	D	C
Route FPS	A	A
Trainer Effectiveness	B	A
Jockey Effectiveness	C	C
3rd Party Ratings	D	C
Predictions AI-generated projections for the upcoming race, derived from prior AI analysis for speed and pace trends, surface and distance suitability, and current conditions. Grading scale: A = elite • B = above average • C = average • D = below average • F = poor • — = no data
Speed	D	C
Early Pace	F	D
Mid Pace	F	D
Late Pace	C	C

Stat	vs. Current Card	vs. All Horses
Averages Career-average metrics across all AI race analysis. Performance and pace averages reflect estimated historical performance; trainer and jockey grades score in-the-money percentages. Grading scale: A = elite • B = above average • C = average • D = below average • F = poor • — = no data
Pick Pony AI Rating	A	A
Speed	A	B
Early Pace	A	A
Mid Pace	A	A
Late Pace	A	A
Finish Pos	C	F
Dirt Speed	A	A
Turf Speed	D	D
Distance Speed	A	A
Trainer Effectiveness	C	A
Jockey Effectiveness	B	A
3rd Party Ratings	A	B
Recent Performance analysis from the horse's recent races, weighted to reflect current form. Sprint and Route FPS (Foot Per Second) measure pace efficiency over the horse's recent sprints and routes respectively. Grading scale: A = elite • B = above average • C = average • D = below average • F = poor • — = no data
Speed	A	B
Early Pace	B	B
Mid Pace	A	B
Late Pace	A	B
Sprint FPS	C	B
Route FPS	C	A
Trainer Effectiveness	C	A
Jockey Effectiveness	B	A
3rd Party Ratings	A	B
Predictions AI-generated projections for the upcoming race, derived from prior AI analysis for speed and pace trends, surface and distance suitability, and current conditions. Grading scale: A = elite • B = above average • C = average • D = below average • F = poor • — = no data
Speed	A	A
Early Pace	A	B
Mid Pace	A	B
Late Pace	C	C

Stat	vs. Current Card	vs. All Horses
Averages Career-average metrics across all AI race analysis. Performance and pace averages reflect estimated historical performance; trainer and jockey grades score in-the-money percentages. Grading scale: A = elite • B = above average • C = average • D = below average • F = poor • — = no data
Pick Pony AI Rating	A	A
Speed	B	C
Early Pace	A	A
Mid Pace	A	A
Late Pace	C	C
Finish Pos	A	C
Dirt Speed	D	B
Turf Speed	D	D
Distance Speed	D	C
Trainer Effectiveness	A	A
Jockey Effectiveness	B	A
3rd Party Ratings	B	C
Recent Performance analysis from the horse's recent races, weighted to reflect current form. Sprint and Route FPS (Foot Per Second) measure pace efficiency over the horse's recent sprints and routes respectively. Grading scale: A = elite • B = above average • C = average • D = below average • F = poor • — = no data
Speed	C	C
Early Pace	A	A
Mid Pace	D	D
Late Pace	C	D
Sprint FPS	A	B
Route FPS	A	A
Trainer Effectiveness	A	A
Jockey Effectiveness	B	A
3rd Party Ratings	B	C
Predictions AI-generated projections for the upcoming race, derived from prior AI analysis for speed and pace trends, surface and distance suitability, and current conditions. Grading scale: A = elite • B = above average • C = average • D = below average • F = poor • — = no data
Speed	B	B
Early Pace	A	A
Mid Pace	A	A
Late Pace	C	C

Stat	vs. Current Card	vs. All Horses
Averages Career-average metrics across all AI race analysis. Performance and pace averages reflect estimated historical performance; trainer and jockey grades score in-the-money percentages. Grading scale: A = elite • B = above average • C = average • D = below average • F = poor • — = no data
Pick Pony AI Rating	B	A
Speed	A	B
Early Pace	D	C
Mid Pace	C	B
Late Pace	A	A
Finish Pos	B	D
Dirt Speed	B	B
Turf Speed	A	B
Distance Speed	B	B
Trainer Effectiveness	C	A
Jockey Effectiveness	A	A
3rd Party Ratings	A	B
Recent Performance analysis from the horse's recent races, weighted to reflect current form. Sprint and Route FPS (Foot Per Second) measure pace efficiency over the horse's recent sprints and routes respectively. Grading scale: A = elite • B = above average • C = average • D = below average • F = poor • — = no data
Speed	B	C
Early Pace	C	C
Mid Pace	B	B
Late Pace	B	C
Sprint FPS	B	B
Route FPS	D	B
Trainer Effectiveness	C	A
Jockey Effectiveness	A	A
3rd Party Ratings	A	B
Predictions AI-generated projections for the upcoming race, derived from prior AI analysis for speed and pace trends, surface and distance suitability, and current conditions. Grading scale: A = elite • B = above average • C = average • D = below average • F = poor • — = no data
Speed	A	B
Early Pace	D	D
Mid Pace	C	C
Late Pace	C	C

Stat	vs. Current Card	vs. All Horses
Averages Career-average metrics across all AI race analysis. Performance and pace averages reflect estimated historical performance; trainer and jockey grades score in-the-money percentages. Grading scale: A = elite • B = above average • C = average • D = below average • F = poor • — = no data
Pick Pony AI Rating	D	D
Speed	A	D
Early Pace	D	F
Mid Pace	C	F
Late Pace	C	D
Finish Pos	B	C
Dirt Speed	A	D
Turf Speed	C	D
Distance Speed	F	F
Trainer Effectiveness	B	B
Jockey Effectiveness	B	A
3rd Party Ratings	A	C
Recent Performance analysis from the horse's recent races, weighted to reflect current form. Sprint and Route FPS (Foot Per Second) measure pace efficiency over the horse's recent sprints and routes respectively. Grading scale: A = elite • B = above average • C = average • D = below average • F = poor • — = no data
Speed	A	D
Early Pace	D	F
Mid Pace	C	D
Late Pace	C	D
Sprint FPS	C	B
Route FPS	B	B
Trainer Effectiveness	B	B
Jockey Effectiveness	B	A
3rd Party Ratings	A	C
Predictions AI-generated projections for the upcoming race, derived from prior AI analysis for speed and pace trends, surface and distance suitability, and current conditions. Grading scale: A = elite • B = above average • C = average • D = below average • F = poor • — = no data
Speed	C	D
Early Pace	D	F
Mid Pace	D	F
Late Pace	C	C

Stat	vs. Current Card	vs. All Horses
Averages Career-average metrics across all AI race analysis. Performance and pace averages reflect estimated historical performance; trainer and jockey grades score in-the-money percentages. Grading scale: A = elite • B = above average • C = average • D = below average • F = poor • — = no data
Pick Pony AI Rating	A	B
Speed	A	D
Early Pace	A	D
Mid Pace	A	D
Late Pace	A	C
Finish Pos	A	A
Dirt Speed	A	D
Turf Speed	C	D
Distance Speed	A	D
Trainer Effectiveness	C	C
Jockey Effectiveness	A	A
3rd Party Ratings	A	C
Recent Performance analysis from the horse's recent races, weighted to reflect current form. Sprint and Route FPS (Foot Per Second) measure pace efficiency over the horse's recent sprints and routes respectively. Grading scale: A = elite • B = above average • C = average • D = below average • F = poor • — = no data
Speed	A	D
Early Pace	A	D
Mid Pace	A	D
Late Pace	A	C
Sprint FPS	A	A
Route FPS	B	B
Trainer Effectiveness	C	C
Jockey Effectiveness	A	A
3rd Party Ratings	A	C
Predictions AI-generated projections for the upcoming race, derived from prior AI analysis for speed and pace trends, surface and distance suitability, and current conditions. Grading scale: A = elite • B = above average • C = average • D = below average • F = poor • — = no data
Speed	A	A
Early Pace	A	B
Mid Pace	A	C
Late Pace	C	C

Stat	vs. Current Card	vs. All Horses
Averages Career-average metrics across all AI race analysis. Performance and pace averages reflect estimated historical performance; trainer and jockey grades score in-the-money percentages. Grading scale: A = elite • B = above average • C = average • D = below average • F = poor • — = no data
Pick Pony AI Rating	C	D
Speed	A	D
Early Pace	D	F
Mid Pace	D	F
Late Pace	A	C
Finish Pos	B	C
Dirt Speed	B	D
Turf Speed	C	D
Distance Speed	A	D
Trainer Effectiveness	B	A
Jockey Effectiveness	B	A
3rd Party Ratings	A	C
Recent Performance analysis from the horse's recent races, weighted to reflect current form. Sprint and Route FPS (Foot Per Second) measure pace efficiency over the horse's recent sprints and routes respectively. Grading scale: A = elite • B = above average • C = average • D = below average • F = poor • — = no data
Speed	A	D
Early Pace	D	F
Mid Pace	D	F
Late Pace	A	C
Sprint FPS	A	A
Route FPS	C	B
Trainer Effectiveness	B	A
Jockey Effectiveness	B	A
3rd Party Ratings	A	C
Predictions AI-generated projections for the upcoming race, derived from prior AI analysis for speed and pace trends, surface and distance suitability, and current conditions. Grading scale: A = elite • B = above average • C = average • D = below average • F = poor • — = no data
Speed	C	F
Early Pace	D	F
Mid Pace	D	F
Late Pace	C	C

Stat	vs. Current Card	vs. All Horses
Averages Career-average metrics across all AI race analysis. Performance and pace averages reflect estimated historical performance; trainer and jockey grades score in-the-money percentages. Grading scale: A = elite • B = above average • C = average • D = below average • F = poor • — = no data
Pick Pony AI Rating	A	A
Speed	B	F
Early Pace	A	D
Mid Pace	A	D
Late Pace	B	D
Finish Pos	C	F
Dirt Speed	A	D
Turf Speed	C	D
Distance Speed	A	D
Trainer Effectiveness	D	F
Jockey Effectiveness	F	F
3rd Party Ratings	B	D
Recent Performance analysis from the horse's recent races, weighted to reflect current form. Sprint and Route FPS (Foot Per Second) measure pace efficiency over the horse's recent sprints and routes respectively. Grading scale: A = elite • B = above average • C = average • D = below average • F = poor • — = no data
Speed	B	F
Early Pace	A	B
Mid Pace	A	C
Late Pace	B	C
Sprint FPS	B	B
Route FPS	A	A
Trainer Effectiveness	D	F
Jockey Effectiveness	F	F
3rd Party Ratings	B	D
Predictions AI-generated projections for the upcoming race, derived from prior AI analysis for speed and pace trends, surface and distance suitability, and current conditions. Grading scale: A = elite • B = above average • C = average • D = below average • F = poor • — = no data
Speed	D	F
Early Pace	B	C
Mid Pace	A	D
Late Pace	C	C

Stat	vs. Current Card	vs. All Horses
Averages Career-average metrics across all AI race analysis. Performance and pace averages reflect estimated historical performance; trainer and jockey grades score in-the-money percentages. Grading scale: A = elite • B = above average • C = average • D = below average • F = poor • — = no data
Pick Pony AI Rating	D	D
Speed	B	C
Early Pace	F	C
Mid Pace	D	C
Late Pace	A	A
Finish Pos	B	D
Dirt Speed	A	A
Turf Speed	D	D
Distance Speed	A	A
Trainer Effectiveness	B	B
Jockey Effectiveness	B	A
3rd Party Ratings	B	C
Recent Performance analysis from the horse's recent races, weighted to reflect current form. Sprint and Route FPS (Foot Per Second) measure pace efficiency over the horse's recent sprints and routes respectively. Grading scale: A = elite • B = above average • C = average • D = below average • F = poor • — = no data
Speed	C	C
Early Pace	D	D
Mid Pace	D	C
Late Pace	B	A
Sprint FPS	D	D
Route FPS	D	D
Trainer Effectiveness	B	B
Jockey Effectiveness	B	A
3rd Party Ratings	B	C
Predictions AI-generated projections for the upcoming race, derived from prior AI analysis for speed and pace trends, surface and distance suitability, and current conditions. Grading scale: A = elite • B = above average • C = average • D = below average • F = poor • — = no data
Speed	A	C
Early Pace	F	F
Mid Pace	D	D
Late Pace	C	C

Stat	vs. Current Card	vs. All Horses
Averages Career-average metrics across all AI race analysis. Performance and pace averages reflect estimated historical performance; trainer and jockey grades score in-the-money percentages. Grading scale: A = elite • B = above average • C = average • D = below average • F = poor • — = no data
Pick Pony AI Rating	B	C
Speed	A	B
Early Pace	B	C
Mid Pace	B	B
Late Pace	B	A
Finish Pos	D	F
Dirt Speed	B	B
Turf Speed	B	B
Distance Speed	B	B
Trainer Effectiveness	B	B
Jockey Effectiveness	B	B
3rd Party Ratings	A	C
Recent Performance analysis from the horse's recent races, weighted to reflect current form. Sprint and Route FPS (Foot Per Second) measure pace efficiency over the horse's recent sprints and routes respectively. Grading scale: A = elite • B = above average • C = average • D = below average • F = poor • — = no data
Speed	A	B
Early Pace	C	D
Mid Pace	B	B
Late Pace	A	A
Sprint FPS	C	D
Route FPS	C	D
Trainer Effectiveness	B	B
Jockey Effectiveness	B	B
3rd Party Ratings	A	C
Predictions AI-generated projections for the upcoming race, derived from prior AI analysis for speed and pace trends, surface and distance suitability, and current conditions. Grading scale: A = elite • B = above average • C = average • D = below average • F = poor • — = no data
Speed	C	C
Early Pace	B	D
Mid Pace	B	D
Late Pace	C	C

Stat	vs. Current Card	vs. All Horses
Averages Career-average metrics across all AI race analysis. Performance and pace averages reflect estimated historical performance; trainer and jockey grades score in-the-money percentages. Grading scale: A = elite • B = above average • C = average • D = below average • F = poor • — = no data
Pick Pony AI Rating	C	C
Speed	D	D
Early Pace	A	B
Mid Pace	C	B
Late Pace	F	C
Finish Pos	B	C
Dirt Speed	D	C
Turf Speed	D	D
Distance Speed	D	C
Trainer Effectiveness	C	C
Jockey Effectiveness	D	D
3rd Party Ratings	A	C
Recent Performance analysis from the horse's recent races, weighted to reflect current form. Sprint and Route FPS (Foot Per Second) measure pace efficiency over the horse's recent sprints and routes respectively. Grading scale: A = elite • B = above average • C = average • D = below average • F = poor • — = no data
Speed	B	C
Early Pace	A	B
Mid Pace	A	B
Late Pace	F	C
Sprint FPS	B	B
Route FPS	B	B
Trainer Effectiveness	C	C
Jockey Effectiveness	D	D
3rd Party Ratings	A	C
Predictions AI-generated projections for the upcoming race, derived from prior AI analysis for speed and pace trends, surface and distance suitability, and current conditions. Grading scale: A = elite • B = above average • C = average • D = below average • F = poor • — = no data
Speed	D	D
Early Pace	A	C
Mid Pace	B	C
Late Pace	C	C

Stat	vs. Current Card	vs. All Horses
Averages Career-average metrics across all AI race analysis. Performance and pace averages reflect estimated historical performance; trainer and jockey grades score in-the-money percentages. Grading scale: A = elite • B = above average • C = average • D = below average • F = poor • — = no data
Pick Pony AI Rating	A	B
Speed	B	C
Early Pace	B	B
Mid Pace	A	B
Late Pace	D	C
Finish Pos	A	C
Dirt Speed	C	B
Turf Speed	B	B
Distance Speed	B	B
Trainer Effectiveness	C	C
Jockey Effectiveness	A	A
3rd Party Ratings	B	C
Recent Performance analysis from the horse's recent races, weighted to reflect current form. Sprint and Route FPS (Foot Per Second) measure pace efficiency over the horse's recent sprints and routes respectively. Grading scale: A = elite • B = above average • C = average • D = below average • F = poor • — = no data
Speed	A	C
Early Pace	C	D
Mid Pace	C	C
Late Pace	A	A
Sprint FPS	A	B
Route FPS	A	A
Trainer Effectiveness	C	C
Jockey Effectiveness	A	A
3rd Party Ratings	B	C
Predictions AI-generated projections for the upcoming race, derived from prior AI analysis for speed and pace trends, surface and distance suitability, and current conditions. Grading scale: A = elite • B = above average • C = average • D = below average • F = poor • — = no data
Speed	B	C
Early Pace	B	C
Mid Pace	A	C
Late Pace	C	C

Stat	vs. Current Card	vs. All Horses
Averages Career-average metrics across all AI race analysis. Performance and pace averages reflect estimated historical performance; trainer and jockey grades score in-the-money percentages. Grading scale: A = elite • B = above average • C = average • D = below average • F = poor • — = no data
Pick Pony AI Rating	A	A
Speed	A	A
Early Pace	F	D
Mid Pace	B	D
Late Pace	B	C
Finish Pos	B	D
Dirt Speed	B	B
Turf Speed	C	D
Distance Speed	A	B
Trainer Effectiveness	A	A
Jockey Effectiveness	A	A
3rd Party Ratings	B	C
Recent Performance analysis from the horse's recent races, weighted to reflect current form. Sprint and Route FPS (Foot Per Second) measure pace efficiency over the horse's recent sprints and routes respectively. Grading scale: A = elite • B = above average • C = average • D = below average • F = poor • — = no data
Speed	A	A
Early Pace	F	F
Mid Pace	C	D
Late Pace	D	D
Sprint FPS	A	A
Route FPS	B	A
Trainer Effectiveness	A	A
Jockey Effectiveness	A	A
3rd Party Ratings	B	C
Predictions AI-generated projections for the upcoming race, derived from prior AI analysis for speed and pace trends, surface and distance suitability, and current conditions. Grading scale: A = elite • B = above average • C = average • D = below average • F = poor • — = no data
Speed	A	B
Early Pace	A	A
Mid Pace	A	A
Late Pace	C	C

Stat	vs. Current Card	vs. All Horses
Averages Career-average metrics across all AI race analysis. Performance and pace averages reflect estimated historical performance; trainer and jockey grades score in-the-money percentages. Grading scale: A = elite • B = above average • C = average • D = below average • F = poor • — = no data
Pick Pony AI Rating	C	A
Speed	A	B
Early Pace	C	B
Mid Pace	A	A
Late Pace	F	D
Finish Pos	D	D
Dirt Speed	B	B
Turf Speed	A	C
Distance Speed	F	F
Trainer Effectiveness	B	B
Jockey Effectiveness	B	B
3rd Party Ratings	A	B
Recent Performance analysis from the horse's recent races, weighted to reflect current form. Sprint and Route FPS (Foot Per Second) measure pace efficiency over the horse's recent sprints and routes respectively. Grading scale: A = elite • B = above average • C = average • D = below average • F = poor • — = no data
Speed	A	A
Early Pace	C	D
Mid Pace	A	D
Late Pace	D	D
Sprint FPS	C	A
Route FPS	D	A
Trainer Effectiveness	B	B
Jockey Effectiveness	B	B
3rd Party Ratings	A	B
Predictions AI-generated projections for the upcoming race, derived from prior AI analysis for speed and pace trends, surface and distance suitability, and current conditions. Grading scale: A = elite • B = above average • C = average • D = below average • F = poor • — = no data
Speed	B	B
Early Pace	A	A
Mid Pace	A	A
Late Pace	C	C

Stat	vs. Current Card	vs. All Horses
Averages Career-average metrics across all AI race analysis. Performance and pace averages reflect estimated historical performance; trainer and jockey grades score in-the-money percentages. Grading scale: A = elite • B = above average • C = average • D = below average • F = poor • — = no data
Pick Pony AI Rating	B	A
Speed	A	B
Early Pace	A	A
Mid Pace	A	C
Late Pace	A	B
Finish Pos	A	A
Dirt Speed	A	A
Turf Speed	C	D
Distance Speed	F	F
Trainer Effectiveness	B	C
Jockey Effectiveness	A	A
3rd Party Ratings	A	A
Recent Performance analysis from the horse's recent races, weighted to reflect current form. Sprint and Route FPS (Foot Per Second) measure pace efficiency over the horse's recent sprints and routes respectively. Grading scale: A = elite • B = above average • C = average • D = below average • F = poor • — = no data
Speed	B	A
Early Pace	A	B
Mid Pace	A	D
Late Pace	A	A
Sprint FPS	D	A
Route FPS	A	A
Trainer Effectiveness	B	C
Jockey Effectiveness	A	A
3rd Party Ratings	A	A
Predictions AI-generated projections for the upcoming race, derived from prior AI analysis for speed and pace trends, surface and distance suitability, and current conditions. Grading scale: A = elite • B = above average • C = average • D = below average • F = poor • — = no data
Speed	A	B
Early Pace	B	B
Mid Pace	A	A
Late Pace	C	C

Stat	vs. Current Card	vs. All Horses
Averages Career-average metrics across all AI race analysis. Performance and pace averages reflect estimated historical performance; trainer and jockey grades score in-the-money percentages. Grading scale: A = elite • B = above average • C = average • D = below average • F = poor • — = no data
Pick Pony AI Rating	B	A
Speed	D	D
Early Pace	A	A
Mid Pace	C	D
Late Pace	D	D
Finish Pos	B	D
Dirt Speed	D	B
Turf Speed	C	D
Distance Speed	B	B
Trainer Effectiveness	D	F
Jockey Effectiveness	A	A
3rd Party Ratings	A	C
Recent Performance analysis from the horse's recent races, weighted to reflect current form. Sprint and Route FPS (Foot Per Second) measure pace efficiency over the horse's recent sprints and routes respectively. Grading scale: A = elite • B = above average • C = average • D = below average • F = poor • — = no data
Speed	B	C
Early Pace	A	A
Mid Pace	B	D
Late Pace	B	C
Sprint FPS	B	A
Route FPS	A	A
Trainer Effectiveness	D	F
Jockey Effectiveness	A	A
3rd Party Ratings	A	C
Predictions AI-generated projections for the upcoming race, derived from prior AI analysis for speed and pace trends, surface and distance suitability, and current conditions. Grading scale: A = elite • B = above average • C = average • D = below average • F = poor • — = no data
Speed	D	D
Early Pace	B	A
Mid Pace	B	B
Late Pace	C	C

Stat	vs. Current Card	vs. All Horses
Averages Career-average metrics across all AI race analysis. Performance and pace averages reflect estimated historical performance; trainer and jockey grades score in-the-money percentages. Grading scale: A = elite • B = above average • C = average • D = below average • F = poor • — = no data
Pick Pony AI Rating	A	A
Speed	A	A
Early Pace	A	A
Mid Pace	A	A
Late Pace	A	A
Finish Pos	C	B
Dirt Speed	A	A
Turf Speed	C	D
Distance Speed	B	A
Trainer Effectiveness	F	F
Jockey Effectiveness	D	D
3rd Party Ratings	A	A
Recent Performance analysis from the horse's recent races, weighted to reflect current form. Sprint and Route FPS (Foot Per Second) measure pace efficiency over the horse's recent sprints and routes respectively. Grading scale: A = elite • B = above average • C = average • D = below average • F = poor • — = no data
Speed	B	A
Early Pace	A	A
Mid Pace	B	A
Late Pace	B	A
Sprint FPS	C	A
Route FPS	A	A
Trainer Effectiveness	F	F
Jockey Effectiveness	D	D
3rd Party Ratings	A	A
Predictions AI-generated projections for the upcoming race, derived from prior AI analysis for speed and pace trends, surface and distance suitability, and current conditions. Grading scale: A = elite • B = above average • C = average • D = below average • F = poor • — = no data
Speed	A	A
Early Pace	A	B
Mid Pace	B	B
Late Pace	C	C

Stat	vs. Current Card	vs. All Horses
Averages Career-average metrics across all AI race analysis. Performance and pace averages reflect estimated historical performance; trainer and jockey grades score in-the-money percentages. Grading scale: A = elite • B = above average • C = average • D = below average • F = poor • — = no data
Pick Pony AI Rating	A	A
Speed	B	A
Early Pace	D	A
Mid Pace	B	A
Late Pace	B	A
Finish Pos	D	B
Dirt Speed	A	A
Turf Speed	C	D
Distance Speed	B	A
Trainer Effectiveness	F	F
Jockey Effectiveness	A	A
3rd Party Ratings	A	A
Recent Performance analysis from the horse's recent races, weighted to reflect current form. Sprint and Route FPS (Foot Per Second) measure pace efficiency over the horse's recent sprints and routes respectively. Grading scale: A = elite • B = above average • C = average • D = below average • F = poor • — = no data
Speed	A	A
Early Pace	A	A
Mid Pace	A	A
Late Pace	A	A
Sprint FPS	D	B
Route FPS	A	A
Trainer Effectiveness	F	F
Jockey Effectiveness	A	A
3rd Party Ratings	A	A
Predictions AI-generated projections for the upcoming race, derived from prior AI analysis for speed and pace trends, surface and distance suitability, and current conditions. Grading scale: A = elite • B = above average • C = average • D = below average • F = poor • — = no data
Speed	D	B
Early Pace	D	B
Mid Pace	B	B
Late Pace	C	C

Stat	vs. Current Card	vs. All Horses
Averages Career-average metrics across all AI race analysis. Performance and pace averages reflect estimated historical performance; trainer and jockey grades score in-the-money percentages. Grading scale: A = elite • B = above average • C = average • D = below average • F = poor • — = no data
Pick Pony AI Rating	B	A
Speed	C	B
Early Pace	C	A
Mid Pace	B	A
Late Pace	C	B
Finish Pos	A	A
Dirt Speed	B	A
Turf Speed	C	D
Distance Speed	B	A
Trainer Effectiveness	B	A
Jockey Effectiveness	B	C
3rd Party Ratings	B	A
Recent Performance analysis from the horse's recent races, weighted to reflect current form. Sprint and Route FPS (Foot Per Second) measure pace efficiency over the horse's recent sprints and routes respectively. Grading scale: A = elite • B = above average • C = average • D = below average • F = poor • — = no data
Speed	C	B
Early Pace	C	B
Mid Pace	C	B
Late Pace	C	B
Sprint FPS	A	A
Route FPS	B	A
Trainer Effectiveness	B	A
Jockey Effectiveness	B	C
3rd Party Ratings	B	A
Predictions AI-generated projections for the upcoming race, derived from prior AI analysis for speed and pace trends, surface and distance suitability, and current conditions. Grading scale: A = elite • B = above average • C = average • D = below average • F = poor • — = no data
Speed	B	B
Early Pace	B	B
Mid Pace	C	B
Late Pace	C	C

Stat	vs. Current Card	vs. All Horses
Averages Career-average metrics across all AI race analysis. Performance and pace averages reflect estimated historical performance; trainer and jockey grades score in-the-money percentages. Grading scale: A = elite • B = above average • C = average • D = below average • F = poor • — = no data
Pick Pony AI Rating	B	A
Speed	D	B
Early Pace	F	C
Mid Pace	D	C
Late Pace	D	B
Finish Pos	A	A
Dirt Speed	C	A
Turf Speed	C	D
Distance Speed	F	F
Trainer Effectiveness	D	D
Jockey Effectiveness	F	F
3rd Party Ratings	B	A
Recent Performance analysis from the horse's recent races, weighted to reflect current form. Sprint and Route FPS (Foot Per Second) measure pace efficiency over the horse's recent sprints and routes respectively. Grading scale: A = elite • B = above average • C = average • D = below average • F = poor • — = no data
Speed	D	B
Early Pace	B	B
Mid Pace	B	B
Late Pace	F	B
Sprint FPS	A	A
Route FPS	B	A
Trainer Effectiveness	D	D
Jockey Effectiveness	F	F
3rd Party Ratings	B	A
Predictions AI-generated projections for the upcoming race, derived from prior AI analysis for speed and pace trends, surface and distance suitability, and current conditions. Grading scale: A = elite • B = above average • C = average • D = below average • F = poor • — = no data
Speed	C	B
Early Pace	F	D
Mid Pace	F	C
Late Pace	C	C

Stat	vs. Current Card	vs. All Horses
Averages Career-average metrics across all AI race analysis. Performance and pace averages reflect estimated historical performance; trainer and jockey grades score in-the-money percentages. Grading scale: A = elite • B = above average • C = average • D = below average • F = poor • — = no data
Pick Pony AI Rating	B	A
Speed	B	A
Early Pace	B	A
Mid Pace	C	D
Late Pace	A	A
Finish Pos	C	B
Dirt Speed	A	A
Turf Speed	C	B
Distance Speed	C	B
Trainer Effectiveness	B	A
Jockey Effectiveness	B	A
3rd Party Ratings	A	A
Recent Performance analysis from the horse's recent races, weighted to reflect current form. Sprint and Route FPS (Foot Per Second) measure pace efficiency over the horse's recent sprints and routes respectively. Grading scale: A = elite • B = above average • C = average • D = below average • F = poor • — = no data
Speed	C	A
Early Pace	C	B
Mid Pace	B	D
Late Pace	A	A
Sprint FPS	D	A
Route FPS	D	B
Trainer Effectiveness	B	A
Jockey Effectiveness	B	A
3rd Party Ratings	A	A
Predictions AI-generated projections for the upcoming race, derived from prior AI analysis for speed and pace trends, surface and distance suitability, and current conditions. Grading scale: A = elite • B = above average • C = average • D = below average • F = poor • — = no data
Speed	B	B
Early Pace	D	B
Mid Pace	C	A
Late Pace	C	C

Stat	vs. Current Card	vs. All Horses
Averages Career-average metrics across all AI race analysis. Performance and pace averages reflect estimated historical performance; trainer and jockey grades score in-the-money percentages. Grading scale: A = elite • B = above average • C = average • D = below average • F = poor • — = no data
Pick Pony AI Rating	C	B
Speed	B	A
Early Pace	B	A
Mid Pace	B	C
Late Pace	A	A
Finish Pos	A	A
Dirt Speed	B	A
Turf Speed	B	A
Distance Speed	A	A
Trainer Effectiveness	A	A
Jockey Effectiveness	B	A
3rd Party Ratings	B	A
Recent Performance analysis from the horse's recent races, weighted to reflect current form. Sprint and Route FPS (Foot Per Second) measure pace efficiency over the horse's recent sprints and routes respectively. Grading scale: A = elite • B = above average • C = average • D = below average • F = poor • — = no data
Speed	D	B
Early Pace	B	A
Mid Pace	C	D
Late Pace	C	B
Sprint FPS	C	A
Route FPS	C	A
Trainer Effectiveness	A	A
Jockey Effectiveness	B	A
3rd Party Ratings	B	A
Predictions AI-generated projections for the upcoming race, derived from prior AI analysis for speed and pace trends, surface and distance suitability, and current conditions. Grading scale: A = elite • B = above average • C = average • D = below average • F = poor • — = no data
Speed	B	B
Early Pace	C	A
Mid Pace	B	A
Late Pace	C	C

Stat	vs. Current Card	vs. All Horses
Averages Career-average metrics across all AI race analysis. Performance and pace averages reflect estimated historical performance; trainer and jockey grades score in-the-money percentages. Grading scale: A = elite • B = above average • C = average • D = below average • F = poor • — = no data
Pick Pony AI Rating	D	B
Speed	F	C
Early Pace	D	C
Mid Pace	F	F
Late Pace	B	B
Finish Pos	A	B
Dirt Speed	B	A
Turf Speed	A	A
Distance Speed	A	A
Trainer Effectiveness	B	A
Jockey Effectiveness	A	A
3rd Party Ratings	B	A
Recent Performance analysis from the horse's recent races, weighted to reflect current form. Sprint and Route FPS (Foot Per Second) measure pace efficiency over the horse's recent sprints and routes respectively. Grading scale: A = elite • B = above average • C = average • D = below average • F = poor • — = no data
Speed	A	A
Early Pace	D	F
Mid Pace	D	F
Late Pace	B	B
Sprint FPS	F	F
Route FPS	F	F
Trainer Effectiveness	B	A
Jockey Effectiveness	A	A
3rd Party Ratings	B	A
Predictions AI-generated projections for the upcoming race, derived from prior AI analysis for speed and pace trends, surface and distance suitability, and current conditions. Grading scale: A = elite • B = above average • C = average • D = below average • F = poor • — = no data
Speed	F	F
Early Pace	A	A
Mid Pace	F	F
Late Pace	C	C

Stat	vs. Current Card	vs. All Horses
Averages Career-average metrics across all AI race analysis. Performance and pace averages reflect estimated historical performance; trainer and jockey grades score in-the-money percentages. Grading scale: A = elite • B = above average • C = average • D = below average • F = poor • — = no data
Pick Pony AI Rating	C	B
Speed	A	A
Early Pace	F	F
Mid Pace	F	F
Late Pace	F	F
Finish Pos	B	B
Dirt Speed	F	C
Turf Speed	D	D
Distance Speed	F	F
Trainer Effectiveness	D	F
Jockey Effectiveness	D	F
3rd Party Ratings	F	C
Recent Performance analysis from the horse's recent races, weighted to reflect current form. Sprint and Route FPS (Foot Per Second) measure pace efficiency over the horse's recent sprints and routes respectively. Grading scale: A = elite • B = above average • C = average • D = below average • F = poor • — = no data
Speed	A	A
Early Pace	F	F
Mid Pace	D	F
Late Pace	F	F
Sprint FPS	F	F
Route FPS	F	F
Trainer Effectiveness	D	F
Jockey Effectiveness	D	F
3rd Party Ratings	F	C
Predictions AI-generated projections for the upcoming race, derived from prior AI analysis for speed and pace trends, surface and distance suitability, and current conditions. Grading scale: A = elite • B = above average • C = average • D = below average • F = poor • — = no data
Speed	A	A
Early Pace	F	F
Mid Pace	F	F
Late Pace	C	C

Stat	vs. Current Card	vs. All Horses
Averages Career-average metrics across all AI race analysis. Performance and pace averages reflect estimated historical performance; trainer and jockey grades score in-the-money percentages. Grading scale: A = elite • B = above average • C = average • D = below average • F = poor • — = no data
Pick Pony AI Rating	A	A
Speed	A	A
Early Pace	C	C
Mid Pace	B	B
Late Pace	A	A
Finish Pos	A	B
Dirt Speed	A	A
Turf Speed	D	D
Distance Speed	A	A
Trainer Effectiveness	B	A
Jockey Effectiveness	A	A
3rd Party Ratings	A	A
Recent Performance analysis from the horse's recent races, weighted to reflect current form. Sprint and Route FPS (Foot Per Second) measure pace efficiency over the horse's recent sprints and routes respectively. Grading scale: A = elite • B = above average • C = average • D = below average • F = poor • — = no data
Speed	A	A
Early Pace	B	B
Mid Pace	B	A
Late Pace	B	A
Sprint FPS	D	D
Route FPS	A	A
Trainer Effectiveness	B	A
Jockey Effectiveness	A	A
3rd Party Ratings	A	A
Predictions AI-generated projections for the upcoming race, derived from prior AI analysis for speed and pace trends, surface and distance suitability, and current conditions. Grading scale: A = elite • B = above average • C = average • D = below average • F = poor • — = no data
Speed	A	A
Early Pace	A	B
Mid Pace	A	A
Late Pace	C	C

Stat	vs. Current Card	vs. All Horses
Averages Career-average metrics across all AI race analysis. Performance and pace averages reflect estimated historical performance; trainer and jockey grades score in-the-money percentages. Grading scale: A = elite • B = above average • C = average • D = below average • F = poor • — = no data
Pick Pony AI Rating	C	A
Speed	B	A
Early Pace	D	C
Mid Pace	C	B
Late Pace	B	A
Finish Pos	A	B
Dirt Speed	C	A
Turf Speed	B	A
Distance Speed	C	A
Trainer Effectiveness	B	A
Jockey Effectiveness	B	A
3rd Party Ratings	B	A
Recent Performance analysis from the horse's recent races, weighted to reflect current form. Sprint and Route FPS (Foot Per Second) measure pace efficiency over the horse's recent sprints and routes respectively. Grading scale: A = elite • B = above average • C = average • D = below average • F = poor • — = no data
Speed	B	A
Early Pace	D	D
Mid Pace	D	C
Late Pace	A	A
Sprint FPS	C	C
Route FPS	D	B
Trainer Effectiveness	B	A
Jockey Effectiveness	B	A
3rd Party Ratings	B	A
Predictions AI-generated projections for the upcoming race, derived from prior AI analysis for speed and pace trends, surface and distance suitability, and current conditions. Grading scale: A = elite • B = above average • C = average • D = below average • F = poor • — = no data
Speed	B	A
Early Pace	D	D
Mid Pace	D	C
Late Pace	C	C

Stat	vs. Current Card	vs. All Horses
Averages Career-average metrics across all AI race analysis. Performance and pace averages reflect estimated historical performance; trainer and jockey grades score in-the-money percentages. Grading scale: A = elite • B = above average • C = average • D = below average • F = poor • — = no data
Pick Pony AI Rating	B	A
Speed	A	A
Early Pace	A	A
Mid Pace	A	A
Late Pace	C	A
Finish Pos	D	D
Dirt Speed	B	A
Turf Speed	D	D
Distance Speed	A	A
Trainer Effectiveness	C	B
Jockey Effectiveness	C	B
3rd Party Ratings	A	A
Recent Performance analysis from the horse's recent races, weighted to reflect current form. Sprint and Route FPS (Foot Per Second) measure pace efficiency over the horse's recent sprints and routes respectively. Grading scale: A = elite • B = above average • C = average • D = below average • F = poor • — = no data
Speed	A	A
Early Pace	A	A
Mid Pace	A	A
Late Pace	C	B
Sprint FPS	B	B
Route FPS	B	A
Trainer Effectiveness	C	B
Jockey Effectiveness	C	B
3rd Party Ratings	A	A
Predictions AI-generated projections for the upcoming race, derived from prior AI analysis for speed and pace trends, surface and distance suitability, and current conditions. Grading scale: A = elite • B = above average • C = average • D = below average • F = poor • — = no data
Speed	A	A
Early Pace	C	D
Mid Pace	C	C
Late Pace	C	C

Stat	vs. Current Card	vs. All Horses
Averages Career-average metrics across all AI race analysis. Performance and pace averages reflect estimated historical performance; trainer and jockey grades score in-the-money percentages. Grading scale: A = elite • B = above average • C = average • D = below average • F = poor • — = no data
Pick Pony AI Rating	B	A
Speed	B	A
Early Pace	A	B
Mid Pace	A	A
Late Pace	C	A
Finish Pos	B	B
Dirt Speed	B	A
Turf Speed	A	A
Distance Speed	A	A
Trainer Effectiveness	F	F
Jockey Effectiveness	F	F
3rd Party Ratings	B	A
Recent Performance analysis from the horse's recent races, weighted to reflect current form. Sprint and Route FPS (Foot Per Second) measure pace efficiency over the horse's recent sprints and routes respectively. Grading scale: A = elite • B = above average • C = average • D = below average • F = poor • — = no data
Speed	B	A
Early Pace	A	B
Mid Pace	A	A
Late Pace	B	A
Sprint FPS	C	B
Route FPS	C	B
Trainer Effectiveness	F	F
Jockey Effectiveness	F	F
3rd Party Ratings	B	A
Predictions AI-generated projections for the upcoming race, derived from prior AI analysis for speed and pace trends, surface and distance suitability, and current conditions. Grading scale: A = elite • B = above average • C = average • D = below average • F = poor • — = no data
Speed	B	A
Early Pace	A	B
Mid Pace	A	A
Late Pace	C	C

Stat	vs. Current Card	vs. All Horses
Averages Career-average metrics across all AI race analysis. Performance and pace averages reflect estimated historical performance; trainer and jockey grades score in-the-money percentages. Grading scale: A = elite • B = above average • C = average • D = below average • F = poor • — = no data
Pick Pony AI Rating	A	C
Speed	A	F
Early Pace	A	B
Mid Pace	A	B
Late Pace	A	D
Finish Pos	C	F
Dirt Speed	A	D
Turf Speed	C	D
Distance Speed	B	D
Trainer Effectiveness	A	A
Jockey Effectiveness	B	A
3rd Party Ratings	A	D
Recent Performance analysis from the horse's recent races, weighted to reflect current form. Sprint and Route FPS (Foot Per Second) measure pace efficiency over the horse's recent sprints and routes respectively. Grading scale: A = elite • B = above average • C = average • D = below average • F = poor • — = no data
Speed	A	D
Early Pace	A	B
Mid Pace	A	B
Late Pace	C	D
Sprint FPS	B	A
Route FPS	A	A
Trainer Effectiveness	A	A
Jockey Effectiveness	B	A
3rd Party Ratings	A	D
Predictions AI-generated projections for the upcoming race, derived from prior AI analysis for speed and pace trends, surface and distance suitability, and current conditions. Grading scale: A = elite • B = above average • C = average • D = below average • F = poor • — = no data
Speed	A	F
Early Pace	A	B
Mid Pace	B	D
Late Pace	C	C

Stat	vs. Current Card	vs. All Horses
Averages Career-average metrics across all AI race analysis. Performance and pace averages reflect estimated historical performance; trainer and jockey grades score in-the-money percentages. Grading scale: A = elite • B = above average • C = average • D = below average • F = poor • — = no data
Pick Pony AI Rating	A	C
Speed	A	F
Early Pace	C	D
Mid Pace	C	D
Late Pace	A	C
Finish Pos	A	C
Dirt Speed	A	D
Turf Speed	C	D
Distance Speed	A	D
Trainer Effectiveness	A	A
Jockey Effectiveness	A	A
3rd Party Ratings	A	D
Recent Performance analysis from the horse's recent races, weighted to reflect current form. Sprint and Route FPS (Foot Per Second) measure pace efficiency over the horse's recent sprints and routes respectively. Grading scale: A = elite • B = above average • C = average • D = below average • F = poor • — = no data
Speed	A	F
Early Pace	B	B
Mid Pace	B	C
Late Pace	A	C
Sprint FPS	C	B
Route FPS	D	B
Trainer Effectiveness	A	A
Jockey Effectiveness	A	A
3rd Party Ratings	A	D
Predictions AI-generated projections for the upcoming race, derived from prior AI analysis for speed and pace trends, surface and distance suitability, and current conditions. Grading scale: A = elite • B = above average • C = average • D = below average • F = poor • — = no data
Speed	A	F
Early Pace	B	C
Mid Pace	C	D
Late Pace	C	C

Stat	vs. Current Card	vs. All Horses
Averages Career-average metrics across all AI race analysis. Performance and pace averages reflect estimated historical performance; trainer and jockey grades score in-the-money percentages. Grading scale: A = elite • B = above average • C = average • D = below average • F = poor • — = no data
Pick Pony AI Rating	A	C
Speed	B	F
Early Pace	A	C
Mid Pace	B	C
Late Pace	C	D
Finish Pos	B	F
Dirt Speed	B	D
Turf Speed	C	D
Distance Speed	C	D
Trainer Effectiveness	A	A
Jockey Effectiveness	A	A
3rd Party Ratings	B	D
Recent Performance analysis from the horse's recent races, weighted to reflect current form. Sprint and Route FPS (Foot Per Second) measure pace efficiency over the horse's recent sprints and routes respectively. Grading scale: A = elite • B = above average • C = average • D = below average • F = poor • — = no data
Speed	A	F
Early Pace	A	B
Mid Pace	A	C
Late Pace	A	C
Sprint FPS	A	A
Route FPS	C	B
Trainer Effectiveness	A	A
Jockey Effectiveness	A	A
3rd Party Ratings	B	D
Predictions AI-generated projections for the upcoming race, derived from prior AI analysis for speed and pace trends, surface and distance suitability, and current conditions. Grading scale: A = elite • B = above average • C = average • D = below average • F = poor • — = no data
Speed	B	F
Early Pace	A	B
Mid Pace	A	D
Late Pace	C	C

Stat	vs. Current Card	vs. All Horses
Averages Career-average metrics across all AI race analysis. Performance and pace averages reflect estimated historical performance; trainer and jockey grades score in-the-money percentages. Grading scale: A = elite • B = above average • C = average • D = below average • F = poor • — = no data
Pick Pony AI Rating	D	F
Speed	F	F
Early Pace	F	F
Mid Pace	F	F
Late Pace	F	F
Finish Pos	A	A
Dirt Speed	F	F
Turf Speed	C	D
Distance Speed	D	F
Trainer Effectiveness	C	F
Jockey Effectiveness	B	C
3rd Party Ratings	F	F
Recent Performance analysis from the horse's recent races, weighted to reflect current form. Sprint and Route FPS (Foot Per Second) measure pace efficiency over the horse's recent sprints and routes respectively. Grading scale: A = elite • B = above average • C = average • D = below average • F = poor • — = no data
Speed	F	F
Early Pace	F	F
Mid Pace	F	F
Late Pace	F	F
Sprint FPS	F	F
Route FPS	F	F
Trainer Effectiveness	C	F
Jockey Effectiveness	B	C
3rd Party Ratings	F	F
Predictions AI-generated projections for the upcoming race, derived from prior AI analysis for speed and pace trends, surface and distance suitability, and current conditions. Grading scale: A = elite • B = above average • C = average • D = below average • F = poor • — = no data
Speed	F	F
Early Pace	F	F
Mid Pace	F	F
Late Pace	C	C

TL;DR

Get more in-depth analysis, expert picks, handicapper reports, AI picks, handicapping tools, in-article data tooltips, NO ADVERTISEMENTS, and other membership perks with a Pick Pony subscription!

Pick Pony takes pride in providing the most accurate expert picks available today. Pick Pony Expert Picks are carefully selected by our team of analysts based on analytics from our advanced Past Performance Sheets and Racing Forms. For potential longshot selections, check out Pick Pony's AI Picks.

Race 1 – Claiming – 1320Y Dirt – $13,300 Purse BOXED TRIFECTA

~~Win: Forever Safe (5) – 71% confidence~~

Place: Methods (8) – 57% confidence🥈

Show: Princessprancealot (1) – 71% confidence🥉

Alternative: Hurricane Saylor (3) – 29% confidence🥇

Race Notes: Forever Safe commands strong consensus as the top selection based on her recent impressive victory at Zia Park and consistent form. The Dick Cappellucci trainee appears well-placed to follow up with jockey Alfredo J. Juarez Jr. in the saddle. Methods and Princessprancealot round out a strong consensus top three, with both horses showing solid recent efforts. The concentration of opinion on these three runners suggests value may exist elsewhere in the field, particularly with Hurricane Saylor, who has legitimate winning credentials from three lengths back at Zia Park.

Race 2 – Claiming – 1430Y Dirt – $13,600 Purse WIN + EXACTA

Win: Epic Battle (3) – 86% confidence🥇

Place: Touch Of Glam (7) – 86% confidence🥈

Show: Coastal Fog (6) – 57% confidence

Alternative: Bodie Got Gold (1) – 14% confidence

Race Notes: Epic Battle represents exceptional consensus value with near-unanimous support across all analyst platforms. The runner finished second last start at Remington Park and has posted two wins from four attempts this campaign, suggesting readiness for a winning effort. Touch Of Glam also garners strong backing after a recent Zia Park victory returning from a nine-week spell. The top two picks separate clearly from the remainder of the field, making this an attractive race for vertical exotics constructed around these runners.

Race 3 – Maiden Special Weight – 1210Y Dirt – $23,500 Purse

Win: Gypsy Wildcat (4) – 71% confidence🥈

Place: Marka (2) – 86% confidence

Show: Mahir (7) – 29% confidence

Alternative: Pass The Test (9) – 14% confidence

Race Notes: This maiden special weight presents split opinion between Gypsy Wildcat and Marka, creating potential value opportunities. Gypsy Wildcat has yet to miss the placegetters in two career starts, most recently finishing second at Zia Park, while Marka makes only her second start after a fourth-place debut. Marka benefits from the Todd W. Fincher barn, which commands respect. The divided opinion suggests both horses merit serious consideration in exacta and trifecta plays, potentially boxing the top two with longer-priced alternatives like Mahir.

Race 4 – Claiming – 8F Dirt – $13,600 Purse WIN + BOXED TRIFECTA

Win: Free Again (6) – 57% confidence🥇

Place: Seahawk Cody (9) – 71% confidence🥉

Show: Three Martinis (8) – 29% confidence🥈

Alternative: Daddy What If (3) – 29% confidence

Race Notes: Seahawk Cody draws significant place consideration despite split opinions on the winner, having placed four times at Sunland Park with a close second last start. Free Again won once this prep at Zia Park two runs back and represents the Todd W. Fincher stable, which has strong meet statistics. The divided sentiment creates opportunities for value players, particularly with Three Martinis showing track-specific prowess as a two-time Sunland Park winner. This distance race may favor tactical speed, suggesting exacta boxes including all three primary selections could yield strong returns.

Race 5 – Claiming – 990Y Dirt – $14,700 Purse WIN + EXACTA

Win: Red Leader (5) – 71% confidence🥇

Place: Mister Mafioso (4) – 57% confidence🥈

Show: Hit Btween The Ice (2) – 57% confidence

Alternative: Laugh Of The Party (8) – 14% confidence

Race Notes: Red Leader returns from a layoff with strong credentials, having posted three wins from 12 attempts this campaign. The morning line favorite at 8-5 receives substantial backing from analyst consensus. Mister Mafioso provides legitimate place and show value with consistent form including two placings from nine runs this prep. Hit Btween The Ice resumes from a 42-week spell but placed last start at Sunland Park, adding intrigue. The sprint distance favors horses with early speed, and all three consensus selections possess tactical pace, making this a solid race for conservative win betting on Red Leader.

Race 6 – Allowance – 1320Y Dirt – $49,700 Purse

Win: Antonios Mark (3) – 43% confidence🥉

Place: Marking Canyon (1) – 71% confidence

Show: Mojica (6) – 29% confidence🥇

Alternative: Holy Hank (5) – 29% confidence🥈

Race Notes: This allowance contest features the most divided analyst opinion on the card, with three horses receiving legitimate win consideration. Marking Canyon won impressively last start at Zia Park and draws the rail, commanding strong place confidence. Antonios Mark has posted three consecutive victories and represents quality recent form. Mojica returns from a layoff as a two-time Sunland Park winner. The scattered consensus suggests this race presents exceptional value for players willing to construct deeper exotic wagers using multiple combinations. Holy Hank adds further intrigue after a seven-week layoff, having won at first outing in this prep.

Race 7 – Allowance – 990Y Dirt – $42,000 Purse

Win: Tizlightning (5) – 86% confidence

Place: Bye Bye Liam (3) – 43% confidence

Show: Competitive Idea (2) – 29% confidence

Alternative: Blooming Resource (7) – 29% confidence🥇

Race Notes: Tizlightning emerges as the strongest consensus selection across the entire card with near-unanimous analyst support. The Dick Cappellucci trainee has posted two wins from three attempts this campaign and won two of three races as the favorite, demonstrating consistent ability to deliver on expectation. Multiple Sunland Park winners Bye Bye Liam and Competitive Idea provide secondary options, though neither commands the same level of confidence. This race shapes as an excellent single in multi-race wagers, with Tizlightning representing the day's most reliable selection based on form, connections, and analyst consensus.

Race 8 – Allowance – 8F Dirt – $49,700 Purse

Win: Holiday Pay (8) – 43% confidence🥈

Place: Battle Strike (4) – 43% confidence

Show: Mine That Star (3) – 43% confidence🥇

Alternative: What A Dude (9) – 14% confidence

Race Notes: This allowance route presents a three-way deadlock in analyst opinion, creating significant value potential for perceptive handicappers. Holiday Pay returns from a layoff and won once this prep at Colonial Downs four runs back. Battle Strike finished second last start at Zia Park from the strong Dick Cappellucci barn. Mine That Star returns from a break as a three-time Sunland Park winner with proven course-and-distance credentials. The complete absence of consensus suggests all three merit equal consideration in multi-horse exotic constructions. Analytical tension stems from evaluating layoff patterns versus recent form, making this the card's most challenging handicapping puzzle.

Race 9 – Maiden Claiming – 1430Y Dirt – $12,900 Purse

~~Win: Speedy Money (2) – 57% confidence~~

Place: Gold Collector (10) – 57% confidence

Show: American Knight (1) – 14% confidence🥉

Alternative: Awsome Charlie (4) – 14% confidence🥈

Race Notes: The finale presents intriguing maiden claimer dynamics with Speedy Money coming off a recent Sunland Park maiden-breaking victory and Gold Collector making his debut. Speedy Money's proven ability at course and distance provides confidence, though debut runners from quality connections merit respect. Gold Collector's debut runner status creates uncertainty, but multiple analysts believe this runner possesses sufficient talent to challenge immediately. The split opinion between proven form and debut potential creates exotic value opportunities, particularly in trifecta and superfecta wagers that include both primary selections along with American Knight and Awsome Charlie.

Recommended Exotic Plays by Race

Race 1

Analysts identify Forever Safe as a strong favorite with balanced value at 3-1 morning line odds. The consensus suggests constructing exactas boxing Forever Safe with Methods and Princessprancealot, as all three command substantial support. A trifecta key using Forever Safe on top with Methods and Princessprancealot in the second and third positions provides solid coverage at reasonable cost. Hurricane Saylor adds intriguing value as an alternative, having run just three lengths behind the winner last start, making a $2 trifecta wheel worth consideration: 5 with 1,3,8 with 1,3,8.

Race 2

Epic Battle represents exceptional consensus value and should anchor all exotic constructions. A straightforward exacta box pairing Epic Battle and Touch Of Glam captures the dominant analyst opinion. For trifecta players, keying these two horses on top with Coastal Fog and Bodie Got Gold underneath provides comprehensive coverage. The overwhelming agreement on the top two selections suggests a $1 trifecta box of 3-7 with 1,6 offers balanced risk-reward, particularly given Touch Of Glam's recent winning form after a nine-week break.

Race 3

The divided consensus between Gypsy Wildcat and Marka creates opportunities for contrarian value. Analysts recommend a $2 exacta box of 2-4 as the foundational play, then expanding to include Mahir in trifecta combinations. A $0.50 trifecta box using 2-4-7-9 captures all horses receiving meaningful support while maintaining reasonable ticket cost. The maiden special weight classification suggests unpredictability, making superfecta coverage advisable for players seeking higher payouts. A $0.10 superfecta wheel using 2,4 on top with 2,4,7,9 in all other positions maximizes coverage.

Race 4

Seahawk Cody's strong place support despite mixed win opinion suggests creative exotic structuring. Analysts favor exacta wheels placing Seahawk Cody in both positions: $2 exacta wheel 9 with 3,6,8 and reverse. Free Again and Three Martinis both possess winning credentials, making a three-horse trifecta box logical: 6-8-9 for $12. The eight-furlong distance creates pace dynamics worthy of consideration, with early speed potentially compromising front-runners. A $0.50 trifecta part-wheel using 6,9 on top, with 3,6,8,9 in second, and 3,6,8,9 in third position provides comprehensive coverage.

Race 5

Red Leader's strong consensus backing at reasonable odds makes this race ideal for vertical exotic structures. A straightforward $2 exacta wheel using Red Leader on top with Mister Mafioso and Hit Btween The Ice provides solid coverage: 5 with 2,4. For trifecta consideration, analysts recommend boxing the top three selections for $12, or alternatively constructing a $1 trifecta wheel: 5 with 2,4 with 2,4,8. The sprint distance favors horses demonstrating tactical speed, and all consensus selections possess early pace, reducing the likelihood of longshot intrusion.

Race 6

The scattered analyst opinion makes this allowance contest the card's prime exotic value opportunity. Analysts recommend aggressive superfecta coverage rather than conservative approach plays. A $0.50 superfecta box using 1-3-5-6 captures all horses receiving meaningful support for $12 total cost. Exacta players should consider a four-horse box covering Antonios Mark, Marking Canyon, Mojica, and Holy Hank for $24. The divided consensus suggests potential for substantial exotic payouts if a moderate price winner emerges. Trifecta wheels using any two of the consensus four with all four underneath provide comprehensive coverage.

Race 7

Tizlightning's overwhelming support makes this race a logical single in multi-race wagers. For players constructing race-specific exotics, analysts recommend exacta wheels using Tizlightning on top with Bye Bye Liam, Competitive Idea, and Blooming Resource for $6. A $2 trifecta key provides balanced coverage: 5 on top with 2,3,7 in second and third positions. The strong consensus suggests conservative wagering approaches, focusing budget allocation on other more competitive races. Daily double opportunities connecting Race 7 to Race 8 merit consideration, wheeling Tizlightning to all competitive runners in the subsequent allowance.

Race 8

The three-way analytical deadlock creates exceptional trifecta and superfecta value potential. Analysts favor comprehensive coverage using Battle Strike, Mine That Star, and Holiday Pay as the foundation: $2 trifecta box for $12, or expanding to include What A Dude for $48 superfecta box at $0.50. The route distance and allowance conditions suggest class and fitness will determine the outcome, making all three consensus selections legitimate contenders. Pick 3 players should utilize this race strategically, either spreading across all three top picks or singling the most compatible selection based on sequence value.

Race 9

The finale's maiden claiming conditions create uncertainty ideal for exotic value plays. Analysts identify Speedy Money's proven course-and-distance credentials as the foundation, but respect Gold Collector's debut potential. A $2 exacta box of 2-10 captures the primary analytical tension, while expanding to include American Knight and Awsome Charlie in trifecta coverage addresses the maiden volatility: $1 trifecta box using 1-2-4-10 for $24. Superfecta players should construct aggressive tickets using these four horses, particularly given the likely presence of overlays in the maiden claiming classification.

Value Play Observations

Race 1 Value Assessment

Forever Safe commands 71% analyst consensus at 3-1 morning line odds, representing fair value rather than overlay opportunity. The public will likely pound this selection, potentially creating underlaid conditions. Hurricane Saylor at 8-1 presents contrarian value, having competed respectably in recent starts while receiving limited analyst support. Analysts suggest saver considerations on Hurricane Saylor in exacta and trifecta positions, particularly given the horse's proximity to the winner last start. Methods at 7-2 appears properly priced given 57% consensus backing.

Race 2 Value Assessment

Epic Battle's 86% consensus at 9-5 morning line odds suggests potential underlaid conditions, with the selection likely to close as heavy favorite. Touch Of Glam at 5-2 represents the superior value proposition, also commanding 86% consensus support but offering better odds. Analysts recommend emphasizing Touch Of Glam in exacta and trifecta plays over the chalk Epic Battle. Coastal Fog at 12-1 presents longshot value given 57% show confidence, making this runner an attractive trifecta saver against the two dominantly supported selections.

Race 3 Value Assessment

Marka commands 86% place consensus despite Gypsy Wildcat receiving majority win support, creating interesting value dynamics. Marka's 5-1 morning line odds appear generous given the widespread analytical backing and Todd W. Fincher training angle. Gypsy Wildcat at 9-2 represents fair odds given 71% win confidence. The value play involves emphasizing Marka over Gypsy Wildcat in win positions, particularly in exacta boxes that cover both horses. Pass The Test at 8-1 offers longshot saver potential despite minimal consensus support.

Race 4 Value Assessment

The split consensus creates value opportunities across multiple selections. Free Again at 2-1 receives 57% win confidence but appears underlaid given the divided analytical opinion. Seahawk Cody at 7-2 represents superior value, commanding 71% place confidence and offering better odds than the marginal win favorite. Three Martinis at 4-1 emerges as the value overlay, receiving limited consensus support despite track-specific winning credentials. Analysts recommend contrarian emphasis on Seahawk Cody and Three Martinis over the chalk Free Again.

Race 5 Value Assessment

Red Leader's 71% consensus at 8-5 morning line odds represents borderline fair value, likely to close as heavy favorite. The value proposition lies in place and show betting on Mister Mafioso at 5-2, who commands 57% place confidence at reasonable odds. Hit Btween The Ice at 6-1 offers potential overlay value given 57% show confidence from a 42-week layoff. Analysts suggest emphasizing exacta reverses between Red Leader and Mister Mafioso rather than straightforward win betting on the favorite. Laugh Of The Party provides longshot saver potential at 8-1.

Race 6 Value Assessment

The scattered consensus creates exceptional value potential throughout the field. Antonios Mark at 3-1 receives only 43% win confidence, suggesting potential underlaid conditions if the public gravitates toward this selection. Marking Canyon at 7-2 commands 71% place confidence and represents superior value given the stronger analytical backing at better odds. Mojica at 9-2 emerges as a potential overlay, receiving limited consensus support despite legitimate winning credentials as a two-time course winner returning from a break. The divided opinion suggests all selections warrant balanced coverage rather than concentration on any single runner.

Race 7 Value Assessment

Tizlightning's 86% consensus at 5-2 morning line odds represents the card's clearest value proposition, likely to close as heavy favorite despite offering reasonable odds. The overwhelming analytical support suggests this selection will underperform value expectations, creating potential underlaid conditions. Bye Bye Liam at 9-2 offers relative value among the secondary selections, though 43% place confidence suggests even this price may prove tight. The value approach involves minimal race-specific wagering, instead utilizing Tizlightning as a confident single in multi-race sequences where the exotic value resides.

Race 8 Value Assessment

The complete absence of consensus distinction creates balanced value across all three primary selections. Holiday Pay at 5-2, Battle Strike at 6-1, and Mine That Star at 2-1 all receive identical 43% confidence ratings, suggesting pricing inefficiency. Mine That Star's 2-1 odds appear underlaid given the three-way deadlock, while Battle Strike at 6-1 represents potential overlay value from the strong Cappellucci barn. Analysts recommend balanced exotic coverage rather than win betting concentration, as the pricing appears compressed relative to the analytical uncertainty. What A Dude at 4-1 provides longshot value despite minimal consensus support.

Race 9 Value Assessment

Speedy Money at 5-1 commands 57% win confidence, representing fair to slight overlay potential given the proven course-and-distance credentials. Gold Collector at 7-2 receives identical 57% place confidence despite debut runner status, suggesting the public may overestimate this selection's chances, creating potential underlaid conditions. American Knight at 9-2 and Awsome Charlie at 4-1 both receive minimal consensus support but offer legitimate longshot value in maiden claiming conditions where form unpredictability favors wider coverage. Analysts recommend balanced exotic structures over directional win betting in this finale.

Overall Wagering Strategy

Race 7 featuring Tizlightning represents the card's strongest consensus opportunity, with 86% analyst confidence suggesting this allowance sprint serves as the ideal foundation for multi-race sequences. Race 2's Epic Battle and Touch Of Glam combination also demonstrates exceptional consensus alignment at 86%, creating another high-confidence anchor point. Race 1's Forever Safe rounds out the strongest consensus selections at 71%, establishing three potential singles for Pick 3, Pick 4, and Pick 5 constructions. These consensus races benefit from clear form advantages, quality trainer representation, and minimal analytical disagreement, characteristics that typically translate to reliable performances.

Races 3, 4, 6, and 8 present split-opinion scenarios where competing selections receive 40-50% confidence ratings. Race 3's maiden special weight divides opinion between Gypsy Wildcat and Marka, with 71% and 86% confidence respectively but in different positions. Race 4's claiming event fragments support across Free Again, Seahawk Cody, and Three Martinis without clear separation. Race 6's allowance contest scatters backing among four legitimate contenders, creating the card's most complex handicapping challenge. Race 8 produces a three-way deadlock with Battle Strike, Mine That Star, and Holiday Pay each receiving identical 43% confidence. These races demand strategic spreading rather than concentration, with exotic value residing in comprehensive coverage acknowledging the analytical uncertainty.

Pick 3 opportunities spanning Races 1-2-3, 5-6-7, and 7-8-9 merit particular attention based on consensus patterns. The early Pick 3 benefits from strong consensus in Races 1 and 2, requiring spreading only in Race 3's competitive maiden field. Constructing tickets using Forever Safe and Epic Battle/Touch Of Glam as singles, then wheeling Race 3, produces manageable ticket costs with reasonable hit probability. The mid-card Pick 3 presents greater challenge, demanding spread across Race 6's divided field while potentially singling Red Leader in Race 5 and Tizlightning in Race 7. The late Pick 3 anchors on Race 7's Tizlightning, requiring spreading in Races 8 and 9's competitive finales. Strategic players should emphasize the early Pick 3 for reliability and the late Pick 3 for potential value payouts.

Superfecta opportunities concentrate in Races 3, 6, 8, and 9 where form unpredictability and divided consensus create pricing inefficiencies. Race 3's maiden special weight classification inherently produces upset potential, with multiple debut runners and limited form history generating analytical variance. Race 6's allowance contest fragments opinion across four selections without clear separation, suggesting potential for moderate-priced runners occupying multiple finishing positions. Race 8's three-way consensus deadlock creates ideal superfecta conditions, as the betting public struggles to separate legitimate contenders, potentially creating overlays throughout the field. Race 9's maiden claiming finale combines debut runners with proven performers, generating characteristic volatility. Analysts recommend $0.50 superfecta boxes or wheels in these races rather than conservative exacta or trifecta approaches, accepting higher risk for substantially greater reward potential.

Track conditions at Sunland Park favor speed on the dirt surface, with the 990Y and 1320Y sprint distances particularly advantaging horses demonstrating tactical early pace. Races 5 and 7 at 990Y benefit front-runners, explaining Red Leader and Tizlightning's dominant consensus positions as both possess early speed capabilities. The longer 8F route races (4 and 8) introduce pace dynamics, potentially compromising wire-to-wire attempts and favoring closers if multiple speed types contest the early lead. Weather conditions forecast for January 12 show mild 48°F temperatures with no precipitation expected, suggesting consistent fast track conditions without bias adjustments. Post position impact appears minimal across the sprint distances, though Rail draws in Races 1, 3, 5, and 7 provide slight tactical advantages for speed types.

Conservative bettors should emphasize win and exacta betting on the three highest-consensus races (1, 2, 7), focusing budget allocation on Tizlightning as the card's most reliable selection and constructing exacta boxes in Races 1 and 2 around the dominant consensus pairs. This approach minimizes risk while targeting reasonable returns on the most analytically supported outcomes. Aggressive players should allocate budget toward superfecta coverage in Races 3, 6, 8, and 9, accepting variance in exchange for substantial payout potential when analytical uncertainty creates pricing inefficiencies. Balanced strategies combine conservative win betting on consensus favorites with strategic superfecta coverage in divided races, allocating approximately 60% of bankroll to confident plays and 40% to value-seeking exotic structures. Pick 3 sequences beginning with Race 1 or Race 5 provide mid-tier risk-reward profiles, offering carryover potential when properly constructed around consensus singles and strategic spreading.

Pick Pony Tip Sheet – Expert picks for Sunland Park, January 12, 2026. 34% WIN RATE + 2 EXACTAS + 2 BOXED TRIFECTAS

Get more in-depth analysis, expert picks, handicapper reports, AI picks, handicapping tools, in-article data tooltips, NO ADVERTISEMENTS, and other membership perks with a Pick Pony subscription!

Race 1 – Claiming – 1320Y Dirt – $13,300 Purse BOXED TRIFECTA

Race 2 – Claiming – 1430Y Dirt – $13,600 Purse WIN + EXACTA

Race 3 – Maiden Special Weight – 1210Y Dirt – $23,500 Purse

Race 4 – Claiming – 8F Dirt – $13,600 Purse WIN + BOXED TRIFECTA

Race 5 – Claiming – 990Y Dirt – $14,700 Purse WIN + EXACTA

Race 6 – Allowance – 1320Y Dirt – $49,700 Purse

Race 7 – Allowance – 990Y Dirt – $42,000 Purse

Race 8 – Allowance – 8F Dirt – $49,700 Purse

Race 9 – Maiden Claiming – 1430Y Dirt – $12,900 Purse

Recommended Exotic Plays by Race

Race 1

Race 2

Race 3

Race 4

Race 5

Race 6

Race 7

Race 8

Race 9

Value Play Observations

Race 1 Value Assessment

Race 2 Value Assessment

Race 3 Value Assessment

Race 4 Value Assessment

Race 5 Value Assessment

Race 6 Value Assessment

Race 7 Value Assessment

Race 8 Value Assessment

Race 9 Value Assessment

Overall Wagering Strategy

Related

Comments

TalkbackCancel reply

Chart Guide (2.0.33)

Chart Guide (2.0.33)

Chart Guide (2.0.33)

Chart Guide (2.0.33)

Chart Guide (2.0.33)

Chart Guide (2.0.33)

Chart Guide (2.0.33)

Chart Guide (2.0.33)

Chart Guide (2.0.33)

Chart Guide (2.0.33)

Chart Guide (2.0.33)

Chart Guide (2.0.33)

Chart Guide (2.0.33)

Chart Guide (2.0.33)

Chart Guide (2.0.33)

Chart Guide (2.0.33)

Chart Guide (2.0.33)

Chart Guide (2.0.33)

Chart Guide (2.0.33)

Chart Guide (2.0.33)

Chart Guide (2.0.33)

Chart Guide (2.0.33)

Chart Guide (2.0.33)

Chart Guide (2.0.33)

Chart Guide (2.0.33)

Chart Guide (2.0.33)

Chart Guide (2.0.33)

Chart Guide (2.0.33)

Chart Guide (2.0.33)

Chart Guide (2.0.33)

Chart Guide (2.0.33)

Chart Guide (2.0.33)

Chart Guide (2.0.33)

Chart Guide (2.0.33)

Chart Guide (2.0.33)

Get more in-depth analysis, expert picks, handicapper reports, AI picks, handicapping tools, in-article data tooltips, NO ADVERTISEMENTS, and other membership perks with a Pick Pony subscription!

Race 1 – Claiming – 1320Y Dirt – $13,300 Purse BOXED TRIFECTA

Race 2 – Claiming – 1430Y Dirt – $13,600 Purse WIN + EXACTA

Race 3 – Maiden Special Weight – 1210Y Dirt – $23,500 Purse

Race 4 – Claiming – 8F Dirt – $13,600 Purse WIN + BOXED TRIFECTA

Race 5 – Claiming – 990Y Dirt – $14,700 Purse WIN + EXACTA

Race 6 – Allowance – 1320Y Dirt – $49,700 Purse

Race 7 – Allowance – 990Y Dirt – $42,000 Purse

Race 8 – Allowance – 8F Dirt – $49,700 Purse

Race 9 – Maiden Claiming – 1430Y Dirt – $12,900 Purse

Recommended Exotic Plays by Race

Race 1

Race 2

Race 3

Race 4

Race 5

Race 6

Race 7

Race 8

Race 9

Value Play Observations

Race 1 Value Assessment

Race 2 Value Assessment

Race 3 Value Assessment

Race 4 Value Assessment

Race 5 Value Assessment

Race 6 Value Assessment

Race 7 Value Assessment

Race 8 Value Assessment

Race 9 Value Assessment

Overall Wagering Strategy

Share this:

Related

Comments

TalkbackCancel reply