Color = surface: green (turf), brown (dirt), blue (synthetic)
Top number = finishing position; bottom number in parentheses = starting post position
Height above line = beaten lengths — closer means a smaller margin
Border = track conditions: green (FST/GD/FM), yellow (WF/SL/YLD), red (SY/MY/FRZ/SFT/HVY)
Connecting Line
Solid = good conditions; dashed = bad conditions
Line Symbol
▲ Triangle = sprint (7f or less); ● Circle = route (more than 7f)
Days Between Races
Small number above each bubble (e.g. 19d) = days since the previous race — helps spot freshness, layoffs, and tight scheduling.
Shaded Band (Bollinger)
Highlights volatility — a wider band means more variation in recent performance
Performance Trend
Straight line showing the overall performance direction — angled up = improving, angled down = declining
Dashed Reference Line
AI Opponent = AI analysis class-level par for the race
Example preview — subscribe to view real performance dataSubscribe now →
[Example] Analyst comments appear here, covering pace profile, trainer trends, jockey notes, surface preferences, and situational flags for today’s race.
Notables: [Example] Key race notables appear here, such as post position bias, recent workouts, class changes, and trip notes flagged by our handicappers.
Example preview — subscribe to view analyst comments & notablesSubscribe now →
E1 / E2 / LP Pace Positions
E1 — Early
E2 — Mid
LP — Stretch
Example preview — subscribe to view E1 / E2 / LP PositionsSubscribe now →
Performance vs. Peers
Performance vs. Peers Guide
Bars (per post)
Blue = avg career performance • Amber = avg last 3 races • Green = last race (improved vs. avg) • Red = last race (declined vs. avg)
Trend Line
Angled line above the bars: rising = improving form • falling = declining form.
Horizontal Line
Field average — the mean career performance of all horses in this race.
Color Circles
Standard post-position colors below each lane — same as the Total Pace chart.
Border
Thicker border = this horse’s post position.
Example preview — subscribe to view Performance vs. PeersSubscribe now →
Figure Comparison
Figure Comparison
Rating
The three Pick Pony algorithm ratings (Algo 1, Algo 2, Algo 3) that make up the overall PP AI Rating — higher is a stronger contender rating.
Speed
Career average speed, recent 3-race average, and last-race speed figure — spot horses in improving or declining form.
Pace
Average Early (E1), Mid (E2), and Stretch (LP) pace figures — reveals pace-setters vs. closers vs. all-the-way types.
This horse
The horse whose stats card is open is highlighted with a darker column background.
Example preview — subscribe to view Figure ComparisonSubscribe now →
Winning Profiles
Winning Profiles
Axes
X: Win % from last 10 starts — Y: In-the-money % (top-3 finishes) from last 10 starts.
Quadrants
Consistent Winners (top-right): high win & ITM — reliable performers. Place Threats (top-left): boards often but doesn’t win often — good exacta/trifecta angles. Streaky (bottom-right): wins occasionally, misses the board often — all-or-nothing. Developing (bottom-left): still finding form — longshot territory.
Reference Lines
Dashed lines mark field averages. Dots to the right win more; dots higher board more.
This horse
Highlighted with a gold border and larger dot.
Example preview — subscribe to view Winning ProfilesSubscribe now →
AI Model Comparison
AI Model Comparison
Winner Models (green)
LGBM, CatBoost, and XGBoost trained to predict race winners. Higher score = stronger contender.
Longshot Models (red)
LGBM-LS, CatBoost-LS, and XGB-LS trained to find high-value longshots. Higher score = stronger longshot candidate.
This horse
Highlighted with a darker column background.
Example preview — subscribe to view AI Model ComparisonSubscribe now →
Stat
vs. Current Card
vs. All Horses
Averages
Career-average metrics across all AI race analysis. Performance and pace averages reflect estimated historical performance; trainer and jockey grades score in-the-money percentages.
Grading scale: A = elite • B = above average • C = average • D = below average • F = poor • — = no data
Pick Pony AI Rating
A
B
Pace Trip Longshot
—
—
Connections Longshot
—
—
Situational Longshot
—
—
Speed
A
C
Early Pace
A
A
Mid Pace
A
A
Late Pace
C
C
Finish Pos
A
A
Dirt Speed
F
F
Turf Speed
C
D
Distance Speed
D
F
Trainer Effectiveness
A
A
Jockey Effectiveness
C
B
3rd Party Ratings
A
B
Recent
Performance analysis from the horse's recent races, weighted to reflect current form. Sprint and Route FPS (Foot Per Second) measure pace efficiency over the horse's recent sprints and routes respectively.
Grading scale: A = elite • B = above average • C = average • D = below average • F = poor • — = no data
Speed
A
C
Early Pace
A
A
Mid Pace
A
A
Late Pace
D
C
Sprint FPS
A
A
Route FPS
A
A
Trainer Effectiveness
A
A
Jockey Effectiveness
C
B
3rd Party Ratings
A
B
Predictions
AI-generated projections for the upcoming race, derived from prior AI analysis for speed and pace trends, surface and distance suitability, and current conditions.
Grading scale: A = elite • B = above average • C = average • D = below average • F = poor • — = no data
Speed
A
A
Early Pace
F
F
Mid Pace
F
F
Late Pace
C
C
A paid membership is required to view all stats.
Subscribe now →
AI Performances Chart
AI SpeedAI OpponentPerformance Trend
Chart Guide (2.0.35)
Bubbles
Color = surface: green (turf), brown (dirt), blue (synthetic)
Top number = finishing position; bottom number in parentheses = starting post position
Height above line = beaten lengths — closer means a smaller margin
Border = track conditions: green (FST/GD/FM), yellow (WF/SL/YLD), red (SY/MY/FRZ/SFT/HVY)
Connecting Line
Solid = good conditions; dashed = bad conditions
Line Symbol
▲ Triangle = sprint (7f or less); ● Circle = route (more than 7f)
Days Between Races
Small number above each bubble (e.g. 19d) = days since the previous race — helps spot freshness, layoffs, and tight scheduling.
Shaded Band (Bollinger)
Highlights volatility — a wider band means more variation in recent performance
Performance Trend
Straight line showing the overall performance direction — angled up = improving, angled down = declining
Dashed Reference Line
AI Opponent = AI analysis class-level par for the race
Example preview — subscribe to view real performance dataSubscribe now →
[Example] Analyst comments appear here, covering pace profile, trainer trends, jockey notes, surface preferences, and situational flags for today’s race.
Notables: [Example] Key race notables appear here, such as post position bias, recent workouts, class changes, and trip notes flagged by our handicappers.
Example preview — subscribe to view analyst comments & notablesSubscribe now →
E1 / E2 / LP Pace Positions
E1 — Early
E2 — Mid
LP — Stretch
Example preview — subscribe to view E1 / E2 / LP PositionsSubscribe now →
Performance vs. Peers
Performance vs. Peers Guide
Bars (per post)
Blue = avg career performance • Amber = avg last 3 races • Green = last race (improved vs. avg) • Red = last race (declined vs. avg)
Trend Line
Angled line above the bars: rising = improving form • falling = declining form.
Horizontal Line
Field average — the mean career performance of all horses in this race.
Color Circles
Standard post-position colors below each lane — same as the Total Pace chart.
Border
Thicker border = this horse’s post position.
Example preview — subscribe to view Performance vs. PeersSubscribe now →
Figure Comparison
Figure Comparison
Rating
The three Pick Pony algorithm ratings (Algo 1, Algo 2, Algo 3) that make up the overall PP AI Rating — higher is a stronger contender rating.
Speed
Career average speed, recent 3-race average, and last-race speed figure — spot horses in improving or declining form.
Pace
Average Early (E1), Mid (E2), and Stretch (LP) pace figures — reveals pace-setters vs. closers vs. all-the-way types.
This horse
The horse whose stats card is open is highlighted with a darker column background.
Example preview — subscribe to view Figure ComparisonSubscribe now →
Winning Profiles
Winning Profiles
Axes
X: Win % from last 10 starts — Y: In-the-money % (top-3 finishes) from last 10 starts.
Quadrants
Consistent Winners (top-right): high win & ITM — reliable performers. Place Threats (top-left): boards often but doesn’t win often — good exacta/trifecta angles. Streaky (bottom-right): wins occasionally, misses the board often — all-or-nothing. Developing (bottom-left): still finding form — longshot territory.
Reference Lines
Dashed lines mark field averages. Dots to the right win more; dots higher board more.
This horse
Highlighted with a gold border and larger dot.
Example preview — subscribe to view Winning ProfilesSubscribe now →
AI Model Comparison
AI Model Comparison
Winner Models (green)
LGBM, CatBoost, and XGBoost trained to predict race winners. Higher score = stronger contender.
Longshot Models (red)
LGBM-LS, CatBoost-LS, and XGB-LS trained to find high-value longshots. Higher score = stronger longshot candidate.
This horse
Highlighted with a darker column background.
Example preview — subscribe to view AI Model ComparisonSubscribe now →
Stat
vs. Current Card
vs. All Horses
Averages
Career-average metrics across all AI race analysis. Performance and pace averages reflect estimated historical performance; trainer and jockey grades score in-the-money percentages.
Grading scale: A = elite • B = above average • C = average • D = below average • F = poor • — = no data
Pick Pony AI Rating
A
A
Pace Trip Longshot
—
—
Connections Longshot
—
—
Situational Longshot
—
—
Speed
A
B
Early Pace
B
A
Mid Pace
A
A
Late Pace
A
B
Finish Pos
A
B
Dirt Speed
B
B
Turf Speed
C
D
Distance Speed
B
B
Trainer Effectiveness
C
D
Jockey Effectiveness
F
D
3rd Party Ratings
A
A
Recent
Performance analysis from the horse's recent races, weighted to reflect current form. Sprint and Route FPS (Foot Per Second) measure pace efficiency over the horse's recent sprints and routes respectively.
Grading scale: A = elite • B = above average • C = average • D = below average • F = poor • — = no data
Speed
A
B
Early Pace
B
B
Mid Pace
A
B
Late Pace
A
A
Sprint FPS
B
A
Route FPS
A
A
Trainer Effectiveness
C
D
Jockey Effectiveness
F
D
3rd Party Ratings
A
A
Predictions
AI-generated projections for the upcoming race, derived from prior AI analysis for speed and pace trends, surface and distance suitability, and current conditions.
Grading scale: A = elite • B = above average • C = average • D = below average • F = poor • — = no data
Speed
A
B
Early Pace
A
A
Mid Pace
A
A
Late Pace
C
C
A paid membership is required to view all stats.
Subscribe now →
Pick Pony's AI Picks powered through another stellar week, covering 476 races across our three algorithms with over 1,387 settled races delivering exceptional results. Algo1 led the charge at 30.7% wins (142 top-pick winners), 65.2% ITM, plus 45 exactas and 39 boxed trifectas. Algo2 followed closely with 29.2% wins (135 winners), 62.6% ITM, matching exacta hits at 45 and boxed trifectas at 39. Algo3 posted 27.7% wins (128 winners), 61.0% ITM, with strong exotic action including 41 boxed trifectas. Just 13-14 races per algo remain pending—full results will only boost these impressive stats!
Standout Wins
Our AI crushed it with high-value longshots and overlays, proving its edge in spotting winners the crowd overlooks. Algo1 nailed STRAIGHTAWAY (8-1 ML) at HOU R5, VANTASTIC (6-1) at SAX R5, and multiple 4-1 shots like Halftime Show (PRX R7) and PROBATE (SUN R9). Algo2 dominated with six 4-1 winners including FIFTY NINE FIFTY (PRX R1), ADIEL (SUN R5), and How About Bob (WRD R8). Algo3 shone brightest on bombers like SINGING EMMA (10-1 ML) at OPX R6, plus consistent 4-1 hits such as TUCUM KARI (SUN R12) and BELTANE (RPX R7). These 405 combined top-pick wins across algos highlight the AI's precision on mid-to-long prices.
Key Insights
This week's dominance came from tracks like PRX, SUN, and SAX, where our algorithms thrived on speed figures, pace setups, and trainer angles—especially in sprints favoring front-runners. Overlays at 4-1 to 10-1 ML were goldmines, with ITM rates above 60% showing reliability for exacta and trifecta plays. Shared winners like HALFTIME SHOW and FIRSTDOWN JUNEBUG across algos underscore the AI's consensus power on value plays. Exotics popped consistently, with boxed trifectas exceeding 39 hits per algo, rewarding bold bettors.
Looking Ahead
With pending races poised to add more wins, Pick Pony's AI is firing on all cylinders—keep riding these picks for profits! Watch PRX and SUN continuations next week, where our models excel on similar profiles.
Weekly Performance Summary
Algorithm Algo1
Metric
Count
Rate
Total Races
476
Top Pick Wins (1st)
142
30.7%
Top Pick Places (2nd)
80
17.3%
Top Pick Shows (3rd)
80
17.3%
Top Pick ITM
302
65.2%
Pending
13
Exotic Wager Hits (Algorithm Algo1)
Wager Type
Hits
Description
Exacta
45
Picks 1 & 2 finished 1st & 2nd in exact order
Boxed Exacta
26
Picks 1 & 2 both finished in top 2, reversed order
Trifecta
16
Picks 1, 2 & 3 finished 1st, 2nd & 3rd in exact order
Notables: [Example] Key race notables appear here, such as post position bias, recent workouts, class changes, and trip notes flagged by our handicappers.