See how we did! Pick Pony Picks Weekly Recap – Week of August 18, 2026

 

Pick Pony Weekly Picks Recap — August 18, 2025

AI Picks Performance This Week

What a week to be a Pick Pony subscriber! Across all of our AI algorithms, the system covered an impressive 734 races through the Algo1, Algo2, and Algo3 families, with the specialized Ai Exacta and Ensemble models adding hundreds more. When the dust settled, our algorithms were firing on all cylinders — posting top-pick win rates ranging from 30.3% up to an outstanding 37.3% for the Ensemble model. To put that in perspective, the morning-line favorite — the so-called “chalk” that the entire industry leans on — won just 36.6% of the same benchmark races this week. Our Ensemble algorithm beat that baseline outright, and every single one of our models ran neck-and-neck with or near it while spanning a far broader and more diverse pool of races. ITM (In The Money) rates were equally impressive, with most algorithms landing between 64.8% and 67.5%, meaning our top picks finished in the top three nearly two out of every three times. It's also worth noting that dozens of races across all models are still listed as pending settlement, so several of those numbers have room to grow even further before the week is fully closed out.

Standout Wins

The highlight reel this week is absolutely worth celebrating. The Ai Exacta model had a spectacular August 16th, rattling off eight top-pick winners in a single day — including NASTY HABIT (5-1) at DMR R9, BRAYBRAY (3-1) at SWF, and HOMEAWAYFROMHOME (3-1) at ELP, proving the model's ability to identify winners across multiple tracks simultaneously. The Ensemble algorithm — our most selective and consensus-driven model — continued to shine with a standout card on August 15th, hitting CAUSEWAY BENNY (5-1), IMPERIAL SPY (4-1), STEAK FRIES (4-1), CADENZA (4-1), and more across EVD, PRX, DMR, and SAR in the same afternoon. On the longshot front, the Algo1 and Algo2 families delivered some serious value, with SPECIAL COLLETTE going off at 10-1 at TDN, GREYHOUND STATION paying at 10-1 at MNR, and MODONDAY (8-1) at GPX — a horse that appeared across multiple algorithms simultaneously, a strong signal of genuine AI conviction. When our models agree, it shows, and MODONDAY delivered.

Key Insights

A few clear themes emerged from this week's data. First, multi-track Saturday coverage continues to be a sweet spot for our AI — August 16th was particularly strong, with wins spread across DMR, ALB, ELP, SWF, EMD, CBY, MTH, and CNL all in a single day, demonstrating the system's ability to process and rank horses across the full national card without losing edge. Second, the longshot identification was exceptional this week. Hits at 8-1 and 10-1 aren't lucky flukes — they reflect the AI's ability to find horses whose true probability of winning is meaningfully higher than what the public betting pools reflect, which is exactly the value proposition Pick Pony is built on. Third, the exotic hit counts were robust across the board — Algo1 alone connected on 58 straight exactas, 42 boxed trifectas, and 18 straight trifectas, giving players who play beyond win bets plenty of ammunition for strong multi-race and multi-horse payouts. Those exotic structures, layered on top of solid win-rate performance, represent where the real bankroll growth happens week over week.

Looking Ahead

With dozens of races still pending final settlement, this week's numbers could look even better by the time the full results come in — so keep an eye on your dashboard for updates. Next week brings another full national card, and with our Ensemble model running above the chalk baseline and the longshot radar clearly locked in, there's every reason to stay engaged and trust the picks. Let's keep the momentum going! 🏇

Weekly Performance Summary

Ai Exacta Winner

Pick Pony's AI Winner models rank every horse in each race using a weighted combination of speed figures, pace analysis, trainer/jockey statistics, track bias, and dozens of other handicapping factors. Each algorithm uses a different set of optimized weights to capture different angles on the same race data. Top Pick Wins measures how often the model's #1 ranked horse won the race outright. Places and Shows count 2nd and 3rd place finishes respectively. ITM (In The Money) is the combined total of Win + Place + Show. Rates are calculated against settled races only (pending results excluded). The Exotic Wager Hits table shows how often the model's top 3 picks finished in the correct order (Exacta/Trifecta) or in any order within the top positions (Boxed Exacta/Boxed Trifecta).

MetricCountRate
Total Races211
Top Pick Wins (1st)4534.9%
Top Pick Places (2nd)2317.8%
Top Pick Shows (3rd)1713.2%
Top Pick ITM8565.9%
Pending66

Exotic Wager Hits (Ai Exacta Winner)

Wager TypeHitsDescription
Exacta14Picks 1 & 2 finished 1st & 2nd in exact order
Boxed Exacta10Picks 1 & 2 both finished in top 2, reversed order
Trifecta6Picks 1, 2 & 3 finished 1st, 2nd & 3rd in exact order
Boxed Trifecta12Picks 1, 2 & 3 all finished in top 3, any order

Algorithm Algo1 Winner

MetricCountRate
Total Races734
Top Pick Wins (1st)18533.5%
Top Pick Places (2nd)9417.0%
Top Pick Shows (3rd)8315.0%
Top Pick ITM36265.5%
Pending114

Exotic Wager Hits (Algorithm Algo1 Winner)

Wager TypeHitsDescription
Exacta56Picks 1 & 2 finished 1st & 2nd in exact order
Boxed Exacta26Picks 1 & 2 both finished in top 2, reversed order
Trifecta16Picks 1, 2 & 3 finished 1st, 2nd & 3rd in exact order
Boxed Trifecta42Picks 1, 2 & 3 all finished in top 3, any order

Algorithm Algo1 Am Winner

MetricCountRate
Total Races734
Top Pick Wins (1st)18533.6%
Top Pick Places (2nd)9216.7%
Top Pick Shows (3rd)8315.1%
Top Pick ITM36065.3%
Pending114

Exotic Wager Hits (Algorithm Algo1 Am Winner)

Wager TypeHitsDescription
Exacta56Picks 1 & 2 finished 1st & 2nd in exact order
Boxed Exacta26Picks 1 & 2 both finished in top 2, reversed order
Trifecta16Picks 1, 2 & 3 finished 1st, 2nd & 3rd in exact order
Boxed Trifecta42Picks 1, 2 & 3 all finished in top 3, any order

Algorithm Algo2 Winner

MetricCountRate
Total Races734
Top Pick Wins (1st)17631.8%
Top Pick Places (2nd)9817.7%
Top Pick Shows (3rd)9316.8%
Top Pick ITM36766.2%
Pending114

Exotic Wager Hits (Algorithm Algo2 Winner)

Wager TypeHitsDescription
Exacta53Picks 1 & 2 finished 1st & 2nd in exact order
Boxed Exacta34Picks 1 & 2 both finished in top 2, reversed order
Trifecta15Picks 1, 2 & 3 finished 1st, 2nd & 3rd in exact order
Boxed Trifecta42Picks 1, 2 & 3 all finished in top 3, any order

Algorithm Algo2 Am Winner

MetricCountRate
Total Races734
Top Pick Wins (1st)17531.8%
Top Pick Places (2nd)9817.8%
Top Pick Shows (3rd)9316.9%
Top Pick ITM36666.4%
Pending114

Exotic Wager Hits (Algorithm Algo2 Am Winner)

Wager TypeHitsDescription
Exacta53Picks 1 & 2 finished 1st & 2nd in exact order
Boxed Exacta34Picks 1 & 2 both finished in top 2, reversed order
Trifecta15Picks 1, 2 & 3 finished 1st, 2nd & 3rd in exact order
Boxed Trifecta42Picks 1, 2 & 3 all finished in top 3, any order

Algorithm Algo3 Winner

MetricCountRate
Total Races734
Top Pick Wins (1st)17030.6%
Top Pick Places (2nd)9917.8%
Top Pick Shows (3rd)9517.1%
Top Pick ITM36465.5%
Pending114

Exotic Wager Hits (Algorithm Algo3 Winner)

Wager TypeHitsDescription
Exacta50Picks 1 & 2 finished 1st & 2nd in exact order
Boxed Exacta36Picks 1 & 2 both finished in top 2, reversed order
Trifecta13Picks 1, 2 & 3 finished 1st, 2nd & 3rd in exact order
Boxed Trifecta41Picks 1, 2 & 3 all finished in top 3, any order

Algorithm Algo3 Am Winner

MetricCountRate
Total Races734
Top Pick Wins (1st)16930.5%
Top Pick Places (2nd)9917.9%
Top Pick Shows (3rd)9517.1%
Top Pick ITM36365.5%
Pending114

Exotic Wager Hits (Algorithm Algo3 Am Winner)

Wager TypeHitsDescription
Exacta50Picks 1 & 2 finished 1st & 2nd in exact order
Boxed Exacta36Picks 1 & 2 both finished in top 2, reversed order
Trifecta13Picks 1, 2 & 3 finished 1st, 2nd & 3rd in exact order
Boxed Trifecta41Picks 1, 2 & 3 all finished in top 3, any order

Algorithm Ensemble Winner

MetricCountRate
Total Races384
Top Pick Wins (1st)10037.3%
Top Pick Places (2nd)4817.9%
Top Pick Shows (3rd)3312.3%
Top Pick ITM18167.5%
Pending89

Exotic Wager Hits (Algorithm Ensemble Winner)

Wager TypeHitsDescription
Exacta30Picks 1 & 2 finished 1st & 2nd in exact order
Boxed Exacta17Picks 1 & 2 both finished in top 2, reversed order
Trifecta8Picks 1, 2 & 3 finished 1st, 2nd & 3rd in exact order
Boxed Trifecta22Picks 1, 2 & 3 all finished in top 3, any order

AI Longshot Picks

Longshot picks are individual horses flagged at publication time: their morning-line odds were 8-1 or greater — prices the betting public considers unlikely to win — and the model's calibrated win probability said the price overpaid. Unlike the winner models above, a longshot is not a race's top-ranked horse, so these tables count selections, not races: every flagged horse is one bet, graded on its own finish, and a single race can contribute more than one. (For the same reason there is no exotic-hits table here — an exacta or trifecta needs a ranked 1-2-3 ticket, which a set of longshot flags does not define.) There is also one longshot table rather than one per algorithm: the flag depends only on the horse's price and its calibrated edge, never on where an algorithm ranked it, so all three models publish exactly the same longshot list. Because longshots win far less frequently by definition, win rates in this section are expected to be substantially lower than the winner models above. That is normal and by design — even a modest longshot win rate of 5-10% can be highly profitable because the payoffs are dramatically larger. A $2 win bet on an 8-1 longshot returns $18. Focus on ITM rate and on the realised ROI in the Longshot Betting Strategy Simulator below rather than on raw win percentage when evaluating longshot model performance.

MetricCountRate
Longshot Selections472
Races Covered324
Wins (1st)277.8%
Places (2nd)4011.6%
Shows (3rd)4212.2%
ITM10931.7%
Pending50

Benchmark: The Morning-Line Favorite

The simplest possible strategy is to always bet the morning-line favorite — the “chalk.” This table shows how that baseline performed across the same thoroughbred races this week, so you can judge the AI's win rates against what the public's top choice delivered. Beating the chalk consistently is the real test of any handicapping model.

MetricCountRate
Settled Races535
Favorite Wins (1st)19636.6%
Favorite Places (2nd)10219.1%
Favorite Shows (3rd)8015.0%
Favorite ITM37870.7%

Consensus Expert Picks

Consensus Expert Picks are derived from multiple independent handicapping sources. Each source submits their top picks per race, and the consensus ranking is built by scoring each horse: 4 points for a 1st-place pick, 3 for 2nd, 2 for 3rd, and 1 for 4th. The horse with the highest total score becomes the consensus top pick. Agreement % measures what share of experts included a horse in their picks — higher agreement signals stronger conviction across sources. The Win/Place/Show/ITM and Exotic stats below measure how the consensus top pick actually performed on race day.

MetricCountRate
Total Races641
Top Pick Wins (1st)15633.1%
Top Pick Places (2nd)9620.4%
Top Pick Shows (3rd)8017.0%
Top Pick ITM33270.5%
Pending170

Exotic Wager Hits (Consensus Top 3 Picks)

Wager TypeHitsDescription
Exacta39Picks 1 & 2 finished 1st & 2nd in exact order
Boxed Exacta31Picks 1 & 2 both finished in top 2, reversed order
Trifecta12Picks 1, 2 & 3 finished 1st, 2nd & 3rd in exact order
Boxed Trifecta46Picks 1, 2 & 3 all finished in top 3, any order

Performance by Breed

Top-pick win rates vary dramatically by breed. Thoroughbred (TB) racing is the most form-driven and predictable, while Quarter Horse (QH) and Arabian (AR) sprints are decided in a few hundred yards and are far more chaotic — they naturally produce lower win rates. Because the summary above blends all breeds together, this table separates them so each breed's true performance is visible. W/P/S are wins, places (2nd), and shows (3rd), with the percentage of settled races in parentheses. ITM is the In-The-Money total (Win + Place + Show). EX/BEX/TRI/BTRI are exacta, boxed-exacta, trifecta, and boxed-trifecta hits on the top picks. Longshot rows count individual flagged selections rather than races (a race can contribute more than one), and show dashes for the exotic columns because those wagers need a ranked 1-2-3 ticket.

Thoroughbred

SourceRacesWPSITMEXBEXTRIBTRI
Algo 1 Winner734185 (33%)94 (17%)83 (15%)362 (65%)56261642
Algo 2 Winner734176 (32%)98 (18%)93 (17%)367 (66%)53341542
Algo 3 Winner734170 (31%)99 (18%)95 (17%)364 (65%)50361341
AI Longshot47227 (8%)40 (12%)42 (12%)109 (32%)

Performance by Track

The tables below break down each pick source's performance at individual tracks. W/P/S show the number of wins, places (2nd), and shows (3rd) with the percentage of settled races in parentheses. ITM is the combined In The Money total (Win + Place + Show). EX (Exacta) counts races where the top 2 picks finished 1st and 2nd in exact order. BEX (Boxed Exacta) counts races where the top 2 picks both finished in the top 2 in either order. TRI (Trifecta) and BTRI (Boxed Trifecta) apply the same logic to the top 3 picks finishing in the top 3 positions. Longshot rows count individual flagged selections rather than races (a race can contribute more than one) and show dashes in the exotic columns, because those wagers need a ranked 1-2-3 ticket that a per-horse longshot flag does not define. Each algorithm (Algo 1, 2, 3) uses different optimized weights, so their performance varies by track — comparing across algorithms at a specific track helps identify which model is strongest for that venue. The ML Favorite (chalk) row shows how the morning-line favorite performed in that track's thoroughbred races — the baseline any pick source needs to beat to be adding value at that venue.

AJX

SourceRacesWPSITMEXBEXTRIBTRI
Expert Consensus80 (—)0 (—)0 (—)0 (—)0000

ALB

SourceRacesWPSITMEXBEXTRIBTRI
Algo 1 Winner102 (22%)2 (22%)1 (11%)5 (56%)0100
Algo 2 Winner102 (22%)1 (11%)2 (22%)5 (56%)0000
Algo 3 Winner101 (11%)1 (11%)2 (22%)4 (44%)0000
Expert Consensus303 (11%)5 (19%)3 (11%)11 (41%)1000
ML Favorite (chalk)105 (50%)1 (10%)1 (10%)7 (70%)

ARP

SourceRacesWPSITMEXBEXTRIBTRI
Algo 1 Winner183 (27%)3 (27%)1 (9%)7 (64%)1000
Algo 2 Winner183 (30%)1 (10%)1 (10%)5 (50%)1010
Algo 3 Winner183 (30%)1 (10%)1 (10%)5 (50%)1010
AI Longshot61 (100%)0 (0%)0 (0%)1 (100%)
ML Favorite (chalk)136 (46%)2 (15%)2 (15%)10 (77%)

ASD

SourceRacesWPSITMEXBEXTRIBTRI
Algo 1 Winner146 (43%)3 (21%)1 (7%)10 (71%)3103
Algo 2 Winner144 (29%)4 (29%)1 (7%)9 (64%)2311
Algo 3 Winner144 (29%)4 (29%)1 (7%)9 (64%)2311
AI Longshot122 (18%)0 (0%)2 (18%)4 (36%)
Expert Consensus146 (43%)4 (29%)3 (21%)13 (93%)1001
ML Favorite (chalk)147 (50%)4 (29%)1 (7%)12 (86%)

BTP

SourceRacesWPSITMEXBEXTRIBTRI
Algo 1 Winner3211 (42%)6 (23%)2 (8%)19 (73%)3215
Algo 2 Winner327 (27%)7 (27%)2 (8%)16 (62%)3415
Algo 3 Winner326 (23%)7 (27%)2 (8%)15 (58%)3403
AI Longshot140 (0%)1 (11%)0 (0%)1 (11%)
Expert Consensus3210 (37%)7 (26%)4 (15%)21 (78%)4425
ML Favorite (chalk)3212 (38%)7 (22%)3 (9%)22 (69%)

CBY

SourceRacesWPSITMEXBEXTRIBTRI
Algo 1 Winner208 (42%)1 (5%)5 (26%)14 (74%)2011
Algo 2 Winner205 (25%)2 (10%)6 (30%)13 (65%)0002
Algo 3 Winner206 (30%)4 (20%)4 (20%)14 (70%)0003
AI Longshot60 (0%)0 (0%)2 (33%)2 (33%)
Expert Consensus228 (36%)2 (9%)7 (32%)17 (77%)1206
ML Favorite (chalk)207 (35%)2 (10%)7 (35%)16 (80%)

CNL

SourceRacesWPSITMEXBEXTRIBTRI
Algo 1 Winner375 (16%)5 (16%)6 (19%)16 (52%)1002
Algo 2 Winner377 (20%)4 (11%)8 (23%)19 (54%)2002
Algo 3 Winner375 (15%)4 (12%)10 (29%)19 (56%)1002
AI Longshot281 (5%)3 (16%)2 (11%)6 (32%)
Expert Consensus379 (27%)4 (12%)7 (21%)20 (61%)3304
ML Favorite (chalk)3710 (27%)7 (19%)8 (22%)25 (68%)

CTM

SourceRacesWPSITMEXBEXTRIBTRI
Algo 1 Winner156 (43%)4 (29%)0 (0%)10 (71%)2101
Algo 2 Winner156 (43%)3 (21%)1 (7%)10 (71%)4000
Algo 3 Winner156 (43%)3 (21%)1 (7%)10 (71%)3100
AI Longshot110 (0%)0 (0%)3 (27%)3 (27%)
Expert Consensus173 (19%)6 (38%)5 (31%)14 (88%)0105
ML Favorite (chalk)154 (27%)5 (33%)2 (13%)11 (73%)

CTX

SourceRacesWPSITMEXBEXTRIBTRI
Algo 1 Winner254 (17%)6 (25%)5 (21%)15 (62%)2101
Algo 2 Winner255 (21%)4 (17%)4 (17%)13 (54%)0102
Algo 3 Winner255 (21%)5 (21%)3 (12%)13 (54%)0102
AI Longshot232 (11%)3 (16%)4 (21%)9 (47%)
Expert Consensus256 (24%)8 (32%)4 (16%)18 (72%)0305

DEL

SourceRacesWPSITMEXBEXTRIBTRI
Algo 1 Winner2710 (45%)4 (18%)2 (9%)16 (73%)3000
Algo 2 Winner2711 (48%)5 (22%)2 (9%)18 (78%)1110
Algo 3 Winner2711 (48%)5 (22%)2 (9%)18 (78%)1110
AI Longshot342 (10%)3 (14%)4 (19%)9 (43%)
ML Favorite (chalk)2711 (41%)6 (22%)4 (15%)21 (78%)

DMR

SourceRacesWPSITMEXBEXTRIBTRI
Algo 1 Winner367 (23%)5 (16%)5 (16%)17 (55%)1101
Algo 2 Winner3611 (33%)6 (18%)5 (15%)22 (67%)2302
Algo 3 Winner3612 (35%)4 (12%)5 (15%)21 (62%)3201
AI Longshot160 (0%)1 (6%)3 (19%)4 (25%)
ML Favorite (chalk)3610 (28%)8 (22%)3 (8%)21 (58%)

ELP

SourceRacesWPSITMEXBEXTRIBTRI
Algo 1 Winner365 (38%)2 (15%)2 (15%)9 (69%)1011
Algo 2 Winner366 (46%)1 (8%)1 (8%)8 (62%)2010
Algo 3 Winner366 (43%)2 (14%)1 (7%)9 (64%)2010
AI Longshot332 (12%)3 (19%)1 (6%)6 (38%)
ML Favorite (chalk)187 (39%)2 (11%)1 (6%)10 (56%)

EMD

SourceRacesWPSITMEXBEXTRIBTRI
Algo 1 Winner128 (67%)2 (17%)0 (0%)10 (83%)3102
Algo 2 Winner124 (33%)2 (17%)3 (25%)9 (75%)0202
Algo 3 Winner124 (33%)2 (17%)3 (25%)9 (75%)1201
Expert Consensus2311 (50%)7 (32%)1 (5%)19 (86%)1202
ML Favorite (chalk)127 (58%)3 (25%)1 (8%)11 (92%)

EVD

SourceRacesWPSITMEXBEXTRIBTRI
Algo 1 Winner268 (31%)4 (15%)3 (12%)15 (58%)3112
Algo 2 Winner267 (29%)7 (29%)2 (8%)16 (67%)1202
Algo 3 Winner266 (25%)7 (29%)3 (12%)16 (67%)1201
AI Longshot310 (0%)3 (12%)1 (4%)4 (15%)
Expert Consensus2610 (38%)6 (23%)2 (8%)18 (69%)3211
ML Favorite (chalk)267 (27%)6 (23%)3 (12%)16 (62%)

FEX

SourceRacesWPSITMEXBEXTRIBTRI
Algo 1 Winner130 (0%)2 (33%)1 (17%)3 (50%)0000
Algo 2 Winner130 (0%)1 (17%)2 (33%)3 (50%)0000
Algo 3 Winner130 (0%)1 (17%)2 (33%)3 (50%)0000
AI Longshot71 (14%)1 (14%)0 (0%)2 (29%)
Expert Consensus131 (17%)2 (33%)0 (0%)3 (50%)0001

FLX

SourceRacesWPSITMEXBEXTRIBTRI
Algo 1 Winner165 (31%)4 (25%)3 (19%)12 (75%)1101
Algo 2 Winner166 (38%)3 (19%)4 (25%)13 (81%)3001
Algo 3 Winner166 (38%)3 (19%)5 (31%)14 (88%)3101
AI Longshot173 (18%)2 (12%)2 (12%)7 (41%)
Expert Consensus246 (40%)3 (20%)3 (20%)12 (80%)3011

FPK

SourceRacesWPSITMEXBEXTRIBTRI
Algo 1 Winner160 (—)0 (—)0 (—)0 (—)0000
Algo 2 Winner160 (—)0 (—)0 (—)0 (—)0000
Algo 3 Winner160 (—)0 (—)0 (—)0 (—)0000
AI Longshot120 (—)0 (—)0 (—)0 (—)
Expert Consensus160 (—)0 (—)0 (—)0 (—)0000

GIL

SourceRacesWPSITMEXBEXTRIBTRI
Algo 1 Winner52 (40%)0 (0%)1 (20%)3 (60%)1010
Algo 2 Winner53 (60%)0 (0%)1 (20%)4 (80%)2000
Algo 3 Winner53 (60%)0 (0%)1 (20%)4 (80%)2010
AI Longshot20 (0%)1 (50%)0 (0%)1 (50%)
ML Favorite (chalk)53 (60%)0 (0%)1 (20%)4 (80%)

GPR

SourceRacesWPSITMEXBEXTRIBTRI
Algo 1 Winner133 (25%)3 (25%)2 (17%)8 (67%)1212
Algo 2 Winner134 (33%)1 (8%)3 (25%)8 (67%)2012
Algo 3 Winner135 (38%)0 (0%)4 (31%)9 (69%)2012
AI Longshot10 (—)0 (—)0 (—)0 (—)
Expert Consensus134 (36%)3 (27%)1 (9%)8 (73%)1101
ML Favorite (chalk)136 (46%)1 (8%)4 (31%)11 (85%)

GPX

SourceRacesWPSITMEXBEXTRIBTRI
Algo 1 Winner288 (44%)3 (17%)2 (11%)13 (72%)4221
Algo 2 Winner286 (32%)6 (32%)3 (16%)15 (79%)3311
Algo 3 Winner285 (26%)7 (37%)2 (11%)14 (74%)0302
AI Longshot71 (25%)0 (0%)0 (0%)1 (25%)
Expert Consensus456 (32%)4 (21%)3 (16%)13 (68%)1211

HCN

SourceRacesWPSITMEXBEXTRIBTRI
Algo 1 Winner186 (33%)3 (17%)2 (11%)11 (61%)1112
Algo 2 Winner187 (44%)5 (31%)2 (12%)14 (88%)1313
Algo 3 Winner187 (44%)5 (31%)2 (12%)14 (88%)1313
AI Longshot20 (0%)0 (0%)0 (0%)0 (0%)
ML Favorite (chalk)189 (50%)3 (17%)1 (6%)13 (72%)

IND

SourceRacesWPSITMEXBEXTRIBTRI
Algo 1 Winner271 (7%)1 (7%)3 (21%)5 (36%)1000
Algo 2 Winner271 (8%)2 (15%)2 (15%)5 (38%)0100
Algo 3 Winner271 (8%)2 (15%)2 (15%)5 (38%)0100
AI Longshot332 (12%)3 (18%)0 (0%)5 (29%)
Expert Consensus304 (27%)1 (7%)3 (20%)8 (53%)1000
ML Favorite (chalk)181 (6%)2 (11%)4 (22%)7 (39%)

LAD

SourceRacesWPSITMEXBEXTRIBTRI
Algo 1 Winner214 (31%)2 (15%)3 (23%)9 (69%)1211
Algo 2 Winner216 (46%)2 (15%)0 (0%)8 (62%)2211
Algo 3 Winner215 (38%)3 (23%)0 (0%)8 (62%)1302
AI Longshot101 (14%)1 (14%)0 (0%)2 (29%)
Expert Consensus215 (38%)1 (8%)3 (23%)9 (69%)1110
ML Favorite (chalk)146 (43%)2 (14%)3 (21%)11 (79%)

LAX

SourceRacesWPSITMEXBEXTRIBTRI
Algo 1 Winner42 (67%)0 (0%)1 (33%)3 (100%)1010
Algo 2 Winner41 (33%)1 (33%)1 (33%)3 (100%)1101
Algo 3 Winner40 (0%)2 (67%)1 (33%)3 (100%)0202

MNR

SourceRacesWPSITMEXBEXTRIBTRI
Algo 1 Winner322 (11%)3 (17%)6 (33%)11 (61%)0100
Algo 2 Winner323 (17%)1 (6%)7 (39%)11 (61%)2020
Algo 3 Winner323 (18%)1 (6%)6 (35%)10 (59%)2010
AI Longshot192 (20%)4 (40%)1 (10%)7 (70%)
Expert Consensus325 (31%)3 (19%)4 (25%)12 (75%)2010
ML Favorite (chalk)247 (29%)6 (25%)4 (17%)17 (71%)

MTH

SourceRacesWPSITMEXBEXTRIBTRI
Algo 1 Winner229 (43%)4 (19%)4 (19%)17 (81%)2200
Algo 2 Winner227 (32%)4 (18%)6 (27%)17 (77%)3212
Algo 3 Winner227 (32%)4 (18%)6 (27%)17 (77%)3111
AI Longshot50 (0%)0 (0%)2 (50%)2 (50%)
Expert Consensus228 (40%)3 (15%)3 (15%)14 (70%)3301
ML Favorite (chalk)2210 (45%)4 (18%)4 (18%)18 (82%)

PEN

SourceRacesWPSITMEXBEXTRIBTRI
Algo 1 Winner239 (41%)5 (23%)2 (9%)16 (73%)1302
Algo 2 Winner239 (41%)2 (9%)4 (18%)15 (68%)3111
Algo 3 Winner239 (41%)2 (9%)4 (18%)15 (68%)4120
AI Longshot110 (0%)0 (0%)1 (10%)1 (10%)
Expert Consensus238 (40%)6 (30%)3 (15%)17 (85%)1204
ML Favorite (chalk)239 (39%)7 (30%)3 (13%)19 (83%)

PID

SourceRacesWPSITMEXBEXTRIBTRI
Algo 1 Winner247 (47%)2 (13%)3 (20%)12 (80%)2112
Algo 2 Winner245 (36%)3 (21%)4 (29%)12 (86%)2201
Algo 3 Winner245 (38%)3 (23%)4 (31%)12 (92%)2201
AI Longshot181 (8%)2 (15%)1 (8%)4 (31%)
ML Favorite (chalk)167 (44%)3 (19%)2 (12%)12 (75%)

PRM

SourceRacesWPSITMEXBEXTRIBTRI
Algo 1 Winner207 (44%)2 (12%)3 (19%)12 (75%)3011
Algo 2 Winner209 (53%)1 (6%)2 (12%)12 (71%)4011
Algo 3 Winner208 (47%)1 (6%)3 (18%)12 (71%)4011
AI Longshot151 (7%)2 (14%)3 (21%)6 (43%)
Expert Consensus329 (33%)5 (19%)6 (22%)20 (74%)5133
ML Favorite (chalk)2010 (50%)3 (15%)1 (5%)14 (70%)

PRX

SourceRacesWPSITMEXBEXTRIBTRI
Algo 1 Winner225 (42%)2 (17%)0 (0%)7 (58%)2010
Algo 2 Winner222 (22%)2 (22%)0 (0%)4 (44%)0000
Algo 3 Winner222 (20%)2 (20%)0 (0%)4 (40%)0000
AI Longshot303 (11%)3 (11%)3 (11%)9 (32%)
Expert Consensus221 (10%)0 (0%)3 (30%)4 (40%)0001
ML Favorite (chalk)123 (25%)2 (17%)2 (17%)7 (58%)

SAR

SourceRacesWPSITMEXBEXTRIBTRI
Algo 1 Winner5015 (36%)5 (12%)5 (12%)25 (60%)3113
Algo 2 Winner5012 (31%)5 (13%)6 (15%)23 (59%)4012
Algo 3 Winner5013 (33%)5 (13%)6 (15%)24 (62%)4012
AI Longshot271 (4%)2 (8%)6 (24%)9 (36%)
Expert Consensus5019 (44%)6 (14%)4 (9%)29 (67%)4113
ML Favorite (chalk)5021 (42%)8 (16%)7 (14%)36 (72%)

SWF

SourceRacesWPSITMEXBEXTRIBTRI
Algo 1 Winner82 (29%)1 (14%)0 (0%)3 (43%)0000
Algo 2 Winner82 (25%)2 (25%)0 (0%)4 (50%)0102
Algo 3 Winner82 (25%)2 (25%)0 (0%)4 (50%)0103
AI Longshot40 (0%)0 (0%)0 (0%)0 (0%)
ML Favorite (chalk)83 (38%)1 (12%)2 (25%)6 (75%)

TDN

SourceRacesWPSITMEXBEXTRIBTRI
Algo 1 Winner327 (32%)2 (9%)7 (32%)16 (73%)3105
Algo 2 Winner326 (26%)6 (26%)5 (22%)17 (74%)0103
Algo 3 Winner325 (21%)4 (17%)6 (25%)15 (62%)1104
AI Longshot191 (6%)2 (11%)1 (6%)4 (22%)
Expert Consensus326 (27%)7 (32%)4 (18%)17 (77%)1301
ML Favorite (chalk)245 (21%)6 (25%)5 (21%)16 (67%)

WOX

SourceRacesWPSITMEXBEXTRIBTRI
Algo 1 Winner328 (38%)3 (14%)2 (10%)13 (62%)4013
Algo 2 Winner329 (41%)4 (18%)3 (14%)16 (73%)3103
Algo 3 Winner329 (41%)3 (14%)3 (14%)15 (68%)3103
AI Longshot190 (0%)0 (0%)0 (0%)0 (0%)
Expert Consensus328 (36%)3 (14%)4 (18%)15 (68%)2010

Comments

No comments yet. Why don’t you start the discussion?

Talkback